๐ค AI Summary
This work addresses the detection of gender bias in online memes by classifying instances into direct, judgmental, or non-gender-discriminatory categories, while simultaneously predicting both hard labels and soft labels in the form of probability distributions. Building upon the XLM-RoBERTa architecture, the proposed approach employs a composite loss function that integrates KL divergence with weighted cross-entropy within the Learning with Disagreement framework to explicitly model annotator disagreement. Temperature scaling is further incorporated to refine soft-label predictions. This methodology enhances modeling capacity for subjective tasks. On the official test set, the model achieves an ICM-Soft-Norm score of 0.3229, an ICM-Norm score of 0.3778, and a hard-label F1-score of 0.4236, ranking 40th out of 118 teams in softโsoft evaluation and 49th out of 187 in hardโhard evaluation.
๐ Abstract
This paper describes the BioSentinel team's participation in EXIST 2026 Task 2.2: Source Intention in Memes, part of the CLEF 2026 evaluation campaign. The task requires classifying the communicative intent behind memes as direct, judgemental, or no (non-sexist), under a Learning with Disagreement (Le-Wi-Di) paradigm that mandates both hard-label and soft-label (probability distribution) predictions. We present a text-centric approach built on xlm-roberta-base (270M parameters) trained with a composite loss function combining KL divergence on soft annotator distributions and weighted cross-entropy on hard labels. On the official test set, the system achieved an ICM-Soft-Norm of 0.3229 and ICM-Norm of 0.3778, with a hard F1-score of 0.4236, ranking 40th (out of 118 submissions) in the soft-soft evaluation and 49th (out of 187 submissions) in the hard-hard evaluation. We provide an analysis of the dataset characteristics, exploratory larger-architecture runs, and the role of annotator disagreement in shaping model design for subjective NLP tasks. Ablation results show that KL loss improves soft-label metrics, while CE loss improves hard-label accuracy. We also report a separate validation-set temperature analysis.