BioSentinel at EXIST 2026: Soft-Label Optimization with XLM-RoBERTa for Sexism Intent Classification in Memes

๐Ÿ“… 2026-07-27
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This work addresses the detection of gender bias in online memes by classifying instances into direct, judgmental, or non-gender-discriminatory categories, while simultaneously predicting both hard labels and soft labels in the form of probability distributions. Building upon the XLM-RoBERTa architecture, the proposed approach employs a composite loss function that integrates KL divergence with weighted cross-entropy within the Learning with Disagreement framework to explicitly model annotator disagreement. Temperature scaling is further incorporated to refine soft-label predictions. This methodology enhances modeling capacity for subjective tasks. On the official test set, the model achieves an ICM-Soft-Norm score of 0.3229, an ICM-Norm score of 0.3778, and a hard-label F1-score of 0.4236, ranking 40th out of 118 teams in softโ€“soft evaluation and 49th out of 187 in hardโ€“hard evaluation.
๐Ÿ“ Abstract
This paper describes the BioSentinel team's participation in EXIST 2026 Task 2.2: Source Intention in Memes, part of the CLEF 2026 evaluation campaign. The task requires classifying the communicative intent behind memes as direct, judgemental, or no (non-sexist), under a Learning with Disagreement (Le-Wi-Di) paradigm that mandates both hard-label and soft-label (probability distribution) predictions. We present a text-centric approach built on xlm-roberta-base (270M parameters) trained with a composite loss function combining KL divergence on soft annotator distributions and weighted cross-entropy on hard labels. On the official test set, the system achieved an ICM-Soft-Norm of 0.3229 and ICM-Norm of 0.3778, with a hard F1-score of 0.4236, ranking 40th (out of 118 submissions) in the soft-soft evaluation and 49th (out of 187 submissions) in the hard-hard evaluation. We provide an analysis of the dataset characteristics, exploratory larger-architecture runs, and the role of annotator disagreement in shaping model design for subjective NLP tasks. Ablation results show that KL loss improves soft-label metrics, while CE loss improves hard-label accuracy. We also report a separate validation-set temperature analysis.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

sexism intent classification
memes
soft-label prediction
annotator disagreement
communicative intent
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

soft-label optimization
XLM-RoBERTa
Learning with Disagreement
KL divergence
meme sexism classification
C
Chandru Munisamy
Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design and Manufacturing, Kurnool, India
K
Karthikeya Raguveer
Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design and Manufacturing, Kurnool, India
Alapan Kuila
Alapan Kuila
IIT KGP
Event ExtractionSentiment AnalysisInformation ExtractionLLM ReasoningNews Media Studies