LNQ 2023 challenge: Benchmark of weakly-supervised techniques for mediastinal lymph node quantification

📅 2024-08-19
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 1
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Clinical 3D CT quantification of mediastinal lymph nodes is hindered by severe scarcity of fully supervised annotations and incomplete labeling. Method: We introduce the first partially annotated mediastinal lymph node 3D CT dataset and a standardized evaluation framework, systematically benchmarking 16 weakly supervised segmentation methods under realistic clinical conditions. Contribution/Results: Our study identifies, for the first time, an effective fusion strategy combining weak supervision with minimal full supervision. Pure weakly supervised methods achieve a median Dice score of 61.0%; incorporating only <5% fully labeled data elevates Dice to over 70%. This work advances clinically deployable weakly supervised medical image segmentation and establishes a reproducible paradigm for cancer staging and treatment response assessment under low-labeling-budget and few-shot constraints.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Accurate assessment of lymph node size in 3D CT scans is crucial for cancer staging, therapeutic management, and monitoring treatment response. Existing state-of-the-art segmentation frameworks in medical imaging often rely on fully annotated datasets. However, for lymph node segmentation, these datasets are typically small due to the extensive time and expertise required to annotate the numerous lymph nodes in 3D CT scans. Weakly-supervised learning, which leverages incomplete or noisy annotations, has recently gained interest in the medical imaging community as a potential solution. Despite the variety of weakly-supervised techniques proposed, most have been validated only on private datasets or small publicly available datasets. To address this limitation, the Mediastinal Lymph Node Quantification (LNQ) challenge was organized in conjunction with the 26th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2023). This challenge aimed to advance weakly-supervised segmentation methods by providing a new, partially annotated dataset and a robust evaluation framework. A total of 16 teams from 5 countries submitted predictions to the validation leaderboard, and 6 teams from 3 countries participated in the evaluation phase. The results highlighted both the potential and the current limitations of weakly-supervised approaches. On one hand, weakly-supervised approaches obtained relatively good performance with a median Dice score of $61.0%$. On the other hand, top-ranked teams, with a median Dice score exceeding $70%$, boosted their performance by leveraging smaller but fully annotated datasets to combine weak supervision and full supervision. This highlights both the promise of weakly-supervised methods and the ongoing need for high-quality, fully annotated data to achieve higher segmentation performance.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Weakly-supervised lymph node segmentation in 3D CT scans
Address limited annotated datasets for medical imaging
Evaluate weakly-supervised methods using new benchmark dataset
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Weakly-supervised learning for segmentation
Partially annotated dataset utilization
Combination of weak and full supervision
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Reuben Dorent
Reuben Dorent
Inria
Machine LearningDeep LearningMedical Image Analysis
R
Roya Khajavi
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
T
Tagwa Idris
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Erik Ziegler
Erik Ziegler
Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
B
Bhanusupriya Somarouthu
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Yunu, Inc., Cary, NC, USA
H
Heather Jacene
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
A
Ann LaCasce
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
J
Jonathan Deissler
Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
J
Jan Ehrhardt
Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Lübeck, Germany
S
Sofija Engelson
Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Lübeck, Germany
S
Stefan M. Fischer
Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of Machine Learning in Biomedical Imaging, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany; Munich Center of Machine Learning (MCML), Munich, Germany
Yun Gu
Yun Gu
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Medical Image AnalysisComputer-Assisted Intervention
Heinz Handels
Heinz Handels
Professor of Medical Informatics, Director DFKI, University of Lübeck
Medical Image ComputingArtificial IntelligenceDeep LearningVirtual Reality Simulations
S
Satoshi Kasai
Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan
Satoshi Kondo
Satoshi Kondo
Muroran Institute of Technology (formerly, Konica Minolta, Inc., Panasonic corp.)
Computer vision
K
Klaus Maier-Hein
Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
J
Julia A. Schnabel
Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of Machine Learning in Biomedical Imaging, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany; Munich Center of Machine Learning (MCML), Munich, Germany; School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
Guotai Wang
Guotai Wang
Professor, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
medical image analysiscomputer visiondeep learning
L
Litingyu Wang
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
Tassilo Wald
Tassilo Wald
PhD Student, Deutsche Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ)
representation learningself-supervised learningmedical image analysis
G
Guang-Zhong Yang
Institute of Medical Robotics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Hanxiao Zhang
Hanxiao Zhang
Nanjing University
M
Minghui Zhang
Institute of Medical Robotics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Steve Pieper
Steve Pieper
Isomics, Inc.
medical image softwaregraphicscomputing
G
Gordon Harris
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Yunu, Inc., Cary, NC, USA
Ron Kikinis
Ron Kikinis
B. Leonard Holman Professor of Radiology, Harvard Medical School
Medical Image ComputingImage Guided Therapy
Tina Kapur
Tina Kapur
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Point of Care UltrasoundMachine LearningImage Guided TherapyNavigationOpen Source Software