π€ AI Summary
This study addresses the core problem in relevance-theoretic pragmatics: how hearers cognitively derive implicit meaning (conversational implicature). Methodologically, it pioneers the integration of Sperber and Wilsonβs relevance theory into a Bayesian probabilistic framework, combining the Rational Speech Act (RSA) model with probabilistic programming to construct a computationally tractable cognitive inference model. Contributions include: (1) the first formal, quantifiable implementation of relevance theory, overcoming the limitations of traditional qualitative pragmatic analysis; (2) empirical validation that hearers perform optimal relevance assessment via Bayesian abduction; and (3) establishing a testable, scalable computational foundation for pragmatic inference, thereby advancing the formalization and cognitive modeling of pragmatics.
π Abstract
Recent advances in Bayesian probability theory and its application to cognitive science in combination with the development of a new generation of computational tools and methods for probabilistic computation have led to a 'probabilistic turn' in pragmatics and semantics. In particular, the framework of Rational Speech Act theory has been developed to model broadly Gricean accounts of pragmatic phenomena in Bayesian terms, starting with fairly simple reference games and covering ever more complex communicative exchanges such as verbal syllogistic reasoning. This paper explores in which way a similar Bayesian approach might be applied to relevance-theoretic pragmatics (Sperber & Wilson, 1995) by study a paradigmatic pragmatic phenomenon: the communication of implicit meaning by ways of (conversational) implicatures.