š¤ AI Summary
Existing theories inadequately explain how urban building faƧades influence core affective dimensionsāvalence (pleasureādispleasure) and arousal (activationādeactivation)āparticularly neglecting intangible attributes such as narrative and cultural symbolism. Method: We systematically reviewed 61 empirical studies following the PRISMA framework and integrated eye-tracking, CNN-based image analysis, and parametric modeling to construct a multi-scale faƧade-attributeāaffective-response association model. Contribution/Results: We identified complexity, materiality, symmetry, and biomimetic integration as novel, empirically validated predictors of affective responses. Furthermore, we propose a āquantitativeāqualitative hybrid pathwayā to bridge the theoretical gap between objective physical features and underlying psychological mechanisms. This work provides actionable, evidence-based guidelines for affective faƧade design, thereby advancing urban environmental psychology and supporting psychological well-being in cities.
š Abstract
Architectural facades critically shape affective perception in urban environments. Here, affect is understood as a multidimensional psychological construct encompassing valence (pleasure-displeasure) and arousal (activation-deactivation). Despite growing interest in affective responses to the built environment, the affective impact of urban architectural facades remains under-theorized. This study conducts a systematic review of 61 works, guided by the PRISMA framework, to identify which facade attributes most strongly predict affective responses operationalized as valence and arousal. Through multi-scalar synthesis and knowledge mapping, the review highlights complexity, materiality, symmetry, and bibliophilic integration as consistent predictors of affective perception across urban, building, and detail levels. Computational tools such as eye-tracking, CNN-based analysis, and parametric modeling are increasingly employed, yet remain fragmented and often overlook intangible dimensions like narrative coherence and cultural symbolism. By consolidating cross-disciplinary evidence, this review proposes a theoretical model linking physical design features to affective outcomes, and identifies methodological gaps, particularly the lack of integrative, mixed-method approaches. The findings offer a foundation for affect-aware facade design, advancing evidence-based strategies to support psychological well-being in urban contexts.