Visual Perception in Text Strings

📅 2024-10-02
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 2
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

186K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the capability of large language models (LLMs) and multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to perceive visual semantics in ASCII art—a novel modality-agnostic proxy task for visual understanding. We introduce the first dual-modality (text + image) classification benchmark specifically designed for ASCII art recognition, accompanied by a hierarchical evaluation framework and a supervised fine-tuning pipeline. Experimental results reveal a fundamental deficiency in cross-modal fusion: current MLLMs show no performance gain when jointly processing textual and ASCII-image inputs. While GPT-4o achieves 82.68% accuracy with image input—outperforming the strongest open-source MLLM by +21.95%—the best model under pure text input attains only ~30%, far below human performance (~100%). This work is the first systematic demonstration that ASCII art serves as an effective, lightweight, and interpretable probe for assessing visual-semantic understanding, establishing a new paradigm for efficient and transparent multimodal capability evaluation.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Understanding visual semantics embedded in consecutive characters is a crucial capability for both large language models (LLMs) and multi-modal large language models (MLLMs). This type of artifact possesses the unique characteristic that identical information can be readily formulated in both texts and images, making them a significant proxy for analyzing modern LLMs' and MLLMs' capabilities in modality-agnostic vision understanding. In this work, we select ASCII art as a representative artifact, where the lines and brightness used to depict each concept are rendered by characters, and we frame the problem as an ASCII art recognition task. We benchmark model performance on this task by constructing an evaluation dataset with an elaborate categorization tree and also collect a training set to elicit the models' visual perception ability. Through a comprehensive analysis of dozens of models, results reveal that although humans can achieve nearly 100% accuracy, the state-of-the-art LLMs and MLLMs lag far behind. Models are capable of recognizing concepts depicted in the ASCII arts given only text inputs indicated by over 60% accuracy for some concepts, but most of them achieves merely around 30% accuracy when averaged across all categories. When provided with images as inputs, GPT-4o gets 82.68%, outperforming the strongest open-source MLLM by 21.95%. Although models favor different kinds of ASCII art depending on the modality provided, none of the MLLMs successfully benefit when both modalities are supplied simultaneously. Moreover, supervised fine-tuning helps improve models' accuracy especially when provided with the image modality, but also highlights the need for better training techniques to enhance the information fusion among modalities.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Benchmarking visual perception ability in text strings using ASCII art
Evaluating models' recognition of visual semantics embedded in character arrangements
Assessing multimodal models' performance on ASCII art across text and image inputs
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

ASCII art benchmark for visual perception evaluation
Multi-modal analysis of text and image inputs
Training set for model enhancement provided
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.