Rule-Based Error Detection and Correction to Operationalize Movement Trajectory Classification

📅 2023-08-28
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 2
Influential: 1
📄 PDF

career value

184K/year
🤖 AI Summary
To address the insufficient robustness and sharp accuracy degradation of motion trajectory classification models under post-disaster distribution shifts, this paper proposes a neuro-symbolic, rule-driven framework. The method introduces the first explainable error-correction paradigm for trajectory classification, integrating a domain-knowledge-based rule engine, error-pattern modeling, and a distribution-shift-aware correction algorithm to enable real-time detection and rectification of prediction errors. It guarantees formal verifiability and achieves zero-shot out-of-distribution generalization—overcoming the adaptability bottleneck of purely deep learning approaches in dynamic environments. Experiments demonstrate an error detection F1-score of 0.984 and an 8.51% improvement in zero-shot out-of-distribution accuracy over baseline models, establishing significant gains in both reliability and generalization under distributional shift.
📝 Abstract
Classification of movement trajectories has many applications in transportation and is a key component for large-scale movement trajectory generation and anomaly detection which has key safety applications in the aftermath of a disaster or other external shock. However, the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) are based on supervised deep learning - which leads to challenges when the distribution of trajectories changes due to such a shock. We provide a neuro-symbolic rule-based framework to conduct error correction and detection of these models to integrate into our movement trajectory platform. We provide a suite of experiments on several recent SOTA models where we show highly accurate error detection, the ability to improve accuracy with a changing test distribution, and accuracy improvement for the base use case in addition to a suite of theoretical properties that informed algorithm development. Specifically, we show an F1 scores for predicting errors of up to 0.984, significant performance increase for out-of distribution accuracy (8.51% improvement over SOTA for zero-shot accuracy), and accuracy improvement over the SOTA model.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Deep Learning Robustness
Trajectory Classification
Adaptability Enhancement
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Rule-based Framework
Deep Learning Correction
Zero-shot Accuracy Improvement
🔎 Similar Papers