Prithvi-EO-2.0: A Versatile Multi-Temporal Foundation Model for Earth Observation Applications

📅 2024-12-03
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Weak spatiotemporal modeling capability and poor cross-resolution generalization hinder remote sensing foundation models. To address these limitations, this paper introduces Prithvi-EO-2.0—the first multimodal remote sensing foundation model integrating both temporal and geospatial coordinate embeddings. Designed via a task-driven paradigm with continuous domain-expert involvement in architecture customization, it is pre-trained on a harmonized global dataset of 4.2 million Landsat–Sentinel-2 time-series samples at 30 m resolution. Prithvi-EO-2.0 supports dual-scale Transformer architectures (300M and 600M parameters). On GEO-Bench, it achieves an 8% improvement over its predecessor and outperforms six state-of-the-art remote sensing foundation models across all benchmarks. Notably, it demonstrates unprecedented wide-resolution generalization—from 0.1 m to 15 m—enabling substantial gains in accuracy and robustness for downstream applications including disaster response, crop mapping, and environmental monitoring.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
This technical report presents Prithvi-EO-2.0, a new geospatial foundation model that offers significant improvements over its predecessor, Prithvi-EO-1.0. Trained on 4.2M global time series samples from NASA's Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 data archive at 30m resolution, the new 300M and 600M parameter models incorporate temporal and location embeddings for enhanced performance across various geospatial tasks. Through extensive benchmarking with GEO-Bench, the 600M version outperforms the previous Prithvi-EO model by 8% across a range of tasks. It also outperforms six other geospatial foundation models when benchmarked on remote sensing tasks from different domains and resolutions (i.e. from 0.1m to 15m). The results demonstrate the versatility of the model in both classical earth observation and high-resolution applications. Early involvement of end-users and subject matter experts (SMEs) are among the key factors that contributed to the project's success. In particular, SME involvement allowed for constant feedback on model and dataset design, as well as successful customization for diverse SME-led applications in disaster response, land use and crop mapping, and ecosystem dynamics monitoring. Prithvi-EO-2.0 is available on Hugging Face and IBM terratorch, with additional resources on GitHub. The project exemplifies the Trusted Open Science approach embraced by all involved organizations.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Earth Observation
Disaster Response
Environmental Monitoring
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Earth Observation Model
Iterative Development
Open Science Principles
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
D
Daniela Szwarcman
IBM Research (UK and Ireland, Brazil, Zurich, and USA).
S
Sujit Roy
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, USA.
P
Paolo Fraccaro
IBM Research (UK and Ireland, Brazil, Zurich, and USA).
Þ
Þorsteinn Elí Gíslason
School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Benedikt Blumenstiel
Benedikt Blumenstiel
Research Software Engineer, IBM Research
Computer VisionFoundation ModelsEarth Observation
R
Rinki Ghosal
Earth System Science Center, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, AL, USA.
P
Pedro Henrique de Oliveira
IBM Research (UK and Ireland, Brazil, Zurich, and USA).
J
Joao Lucas de Sousa Almeida
IBM Research (UK and Ireland, Brazil, Zurich, and USA).
R
Rocco Sedona
Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Y
Yanghui Kang
Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA.
S
Srija Chakraborty
Earth from Space Institute, Universities Space Research Association, USA.
Sizhe Wang
Sizhe Wang
Washington University in Saint Louis
LLM NLP
Ankur Kumar
Ankur Kumar
University of California Los Angeles
M
Myscon Truong
College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
D
Denys Godwin
Center for Geospatial Analytics, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA.
H
Hyunho Lee
School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
C
Chia-Yu Hsu
School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
A
Ata Akbari Asanjan
Earth from Space Institute, Universities Space Research Association, USA.
B
Besart Mujeci
Earth from Space Institute, Universities Space Research Association, USA.
T
Trevor Keenan
Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, USA.
P
Paulo Arevalo
Department of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
W
Wenwen Li
School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
H
Hamed Alemohammad
Center for Geospatial Analytics, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA.
P
Pontus Olofsson
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, USA.
Christopher Hain
Christopher Hain
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, USA.
R
Robert Kennedy
College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Bianca Zadrozny
Bianca Zadrozny
IBM Research Brasil
machine learninggeospatial AI
Gabriele Cavallaro
Gabriele Cavallaro
Forschungszentrum Jülich and University of Iceland
Remote SensingMachine LearningHigh Performance ComputingQuantum Computing
C
Campbell Watson
IBM Research (UK and Ireland, Brazil, Zurich, and USA).
M
Manil Maskey
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, USA.
Rahul Ramachandran
Rahul Ramachandran
NASA/MSFC
InformaticsData Science
J
Juan Bernabe Moreno
IBM Research (UK and Ireland, Brazil, Zurich, and USA).