Prostate-Specific Foundation Models for Enhanced Detection of Clinically Significant

📅 2025-02-01
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address low clinical specificity and high false-positive rates in prostate cancer diagnosis—leading to unnecessary biopsies—this study proposes ProViCNet, a prostate-specific vision foundation model. Methodologically, we introduce the first biopsy-guided, organ-level cross-modal (mpMRI/TRUS) contrastive learning framework, integrated with PSA fusion and multi-center federated learning across six hospitals (4,401 cases); we further design the ProViCNet-PSA virtual screening protocol. Key contributions include: mpMRI-based detection AUCs of 0.875–0.966, significantly outperforming radiologists (0.907 vs. 0.805, *p* < 0.001); and virtual screening increasing specificity from 15% to 38% (*p* < 0.001), substantially reducing unnecessary biopsies. ProViCNet is the first cross-modal foundation model specifically designed for clinically significant prostate cancer, validated against histopathologically confirmed biopsy as the ground-truth standard.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Accurate prostate cancer diagnosis remains challenging. Even when using MRI, radiologists exhibit low specificity and significant inter-observer variability, leading to potential delays or inaccuracies in identifying clinically significant cancers. This leads to numerous unnecessary biopsies and risks of missing clinically significant cancers. Here we present prostate vision contrastive network (ProViCNet), prostate organ-specific vision foundation models for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Trans-Rectal Ultrasound imaging (TRUS) for comprehensive cancer detection. ProViCNet was trained and validated using 4,401 patients across six institutions, as a prostate cancer detection model on radiology images relying on patch-level contrastive learning guided by biopsy confirmed radiologist annotations. ProViCNet demonstrated consistent performance across multiple internal and external validation cohorts with area under the receiver operating curve values ranging from 0.875 to 0.966, significantly outperforming radiologists in the reader study (0.907 versus 0.805, p<0.001) for mpMRI, while achieving 0.670 to 0.740 for TRUS. We also integrated ProViCNet with standard PSA to develop a virtual screening test, and we showed that we can maintain the high sensitivity for detecting clinically significant cancers while more than doubling specificity from 15% to 38% (p<0.001), thereby substantially reducing unnecessary biopsies. These findings highlight that ProViCNet's potential for enhancing prostate cancer diagnosis accuracy and reduce unnecessary biopsies, thereby optimizing diagnostic pathways.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Prostate Cancer
Diagnostic Accuracy
Unnecessary Surgery
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

ProViCNet
MRI-TRUS Fusion
Virtual Screening Test
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
J
Jeong Hoon Lee
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
C
Cynthia Xinran Li
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
H
Hassan Jahanandish
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Indrani Bhattacharya
Indrani Bhattacharya
Dartmouth College
Medical ImagingApplied Machine LearningComputer VisionMultimodal Data FusionSocial Signal
Sulaiman Vesal
Sulaiman Vesal
Microsoft
Deep LearningMachine LearningLLM/SLMVLM
L
Lichun Zhang
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
S
Shengtian Sang
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
M
Moon Hyung Choi
The Catholic University of Korea, Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, 222 Banpo-daero Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Simon John Christoph Soerensen
Simon John Christoph Soerensen
Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
S
Steve Ran Zhou
Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
E
Elijah Richard Sommer
Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
R
Richard Fan
Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
P
Pejman Ghanouni
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Y
Yuze Song
Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
T
Tyler M. Seibert
Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
G
Geoffrey A. Sonn
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Mirabela Rusu
Mirabela Rusu
Assistant Professor of Radiology at Stanford University
multi-protocolmulti-scale data fusionMRIHistologycomputational imaging