🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge that counterfactual interventions in continuous generative models often induce manifold tearing under extreme conditions, thereby compromising individual identity consistency. We introduce the concepts of a “counterfactual event horizon” and a “manifold tearing theorem,” formally characterizing, for the first time, the fundamental trade-off between intervention strength and identity preservation, and establishing a causal uncertainty principle. Leveraging differential geometry and topological analysis, we develop the Geometrically-Aware Causal Flow (GACF) algorithm, augmented with a topological radar mechanism, to enable stable and scalable counterfactual reasoning in high-dimensional spaces. Experiments on single-cell RNA sequencing data demonstrate that GACF effectively avoids manifold tearing, yielding counterfactual outcomes that are both interpretable and identity-consistent.
📝 Abstract
Judea Pearl's do-calculus provides a foundation for causal inference, but its translation to continuous generative models remains fraught with geometric challenges. We establish the fundamental limits of such interventions. We define the Counterfactual Event Horizon and prove the Manifold Tearing Theorem: deterministic flows inevitably develop finite-time singularities under extreme interventions. We establish the Causal Uncertainty Principle for the trade-off between intervention extremity and identity preservation. Finally, we introduce Geometry-Aware Causal Flow (GACF), a scalable algorithm that utilizes a topological radar to bypass manifold tearing, validated on high-dimensional scRNA-seq data.