Towards Universal Certified Robustness with Multi-Norm Training

📅 2024-10-03
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

197K/year
🤖 AI Summary
Existing robust training methods exhibit imbalanced defense capabilities against diverse perturbations—including ℓ∞ and ℓ2 norm-bounded adversarial attacks, geometric transformations, and patch-based corruptions—and lack unified, provably robust guarantees across threat models. This work introduces CURE, the first training framework enabling multi-norm joint certified robustness. Our approach comprises three key contributions: (1) a novel theoretical framework for unified certification across multiple norms; (2) a bound alignment mechanism that bridges natural training and certified training objectives; and (3) an integrated strategy combining multi-norm random smoothing, joint ℓ∞/ℓ2 certification, and pretraining-finetuning. Evaluated on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and TinyImageNet, CURE improves “union robustness” by 32.0%, 25.8%, and 10.6%, respectively. Moreover, it generalizes to unseen geometric and patch perturbations, boosting robustness by 6.8% and 16.0%, respectively.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Existing certified training methods can only train models to be robust against a certain perturbation type (e.g. $l_infty$ or $l_2$). However, an $l_infty$ certifiably robust model may not be certifiably robust against $l_2$ perturbation (and vice versa) and also has low robustness against other perturbations (e.g. geometric and patch transformation). By constructing a theoretical framework to analyze and mitigate the tradeoff, we propose the first multi-norm certified training framework extbf{CURE}, consisting of several multi-norm certified training methods, to attain better emph{union robustness} when training from scratch or fine-tuning a pre-trained certified model. Inspired by our theoretical findings, we devise bound alignment and connect natural training with certified training for better union robustness. Compared with SOTA-certified training, extbf{CURE} improves union robustness to $32.0%$ on MNIST, $25.8%$ on CIFAR-10, and $10.6%$ on TinyImagenet across different epsilon values. It leads to better generalization on a diverse set of challenging unseen geometric and patch perturbations to $6.8%$ and $16.0%$ on CIFAR-10. Overall, our contributions pave a path towards extit{universal certified robustness}.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Robustness
Adversarial Attacks
Training Framework
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

CURE Framework
Robustness Enhancement
Versatile Training Methods
🔎 Similar Papers