🤖 AI Summary
Current breast ultrasound diagnostic models are predominantly end-to-end black-box systems, which are highly susceptible to extreme data imbalance and often overlook rare yet critical malignant features, resulting in insufficient reliability and interpretability. This work proposes the Latent-CURE framework, which uniquely integrates latent-space reasoning with clinical BI-RADS diagnostic logic. By employing an asymmetrically weighted chain-of-thought mechanism, the model is guided to sequentially reason over morphological descriptors. Furthermore, a dual asymmetric optimization strategy coupled with dynamic margin adjustment is introduced to mitigate the scarcity of malignant samples. Evaluated on highly imbalanced real-world data, the proposed method substantially enhances the detection of rare malignant patterns while maintaining high specificity and delivering clinically coherent, interpretable diagnostic justifications.
📝 Abstract
Multimodal Large Models have significantly advanced automated breast ultrasound diagnosis. However, most existing frameworks utilize opaque, end-to-end paradigms prioritizing global statistical correlations over structured clinical reasoning. Consequently, these models remain susceptible to shortcut learning amid extreme real-world epidemiological imbalances, often bypassing rare but decisive malignant indicators for dominant benign patterns. To address this disconnect, we propose Latent-CURE, a novel diagnostic framework driven by asymmetric weighted chain-of-thought methodology grounded in latent space reasoning. Unlike traditional approaches, our framework constructs an implicit reasoning trajectory forcing the model to sequentially infer standardized BI-RADS morphological descriptors before converging on a final diagnosis. Furthermore, to combat the extreme scarcity of critical malignant features, we couple this architecture with a dual-asymmetric optimization strategy. By dynamically adjusting margins and weights, this strategy safeguards high-specificity malignant descriptors from being overshadowed by common benign priors. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that our knowledge-injected approach provides transparent clinical evidence while achieving robust, accurate diagnostic performance in imbalanced medical cohorts.