Ranking Metrics: Extending Acceptability and Performance Indexes

📅 2026-04-06
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the limitations of traditional risk-adjusted performance measures—such as the Sharpe ratio—in effectively ranking financial or insurance positions. The authors develop an axiomatic framework that introduces monotonicity and cash quasi-concavity to define a novel class of ranking measures, which map positions directly to performance levels rather than standardized returns. This approach establishes theoretical connections with acceptance sets and risk measures, encompassing classical ratio-based metrics while extending to new ranking methodologies grounded in expected shortfall, Lambda quantiles, and bibliometric-inspired constructions. Empirical analyses involving portfolio rankings and climate risk insurance demonstrate both the theoretical coherence and practical applicability of the proposed framework.
📝 Abstract
This paper develops an axiomatic framework for ranking metrics, a general class of functionals for evaluating and ordering financial or insurance positions. Unlike traditional risk-adjusted performance measures-such as the Sharpe ratio, RAROC, or Omega-that express reward per unit of risk, ranking metrics assign each position a performance level rather than a normalized return. Relying on monotonicity and a new property called cash-quasiconcavity, we derive representation results linking ranking metrics to families of acceptance sets and risk measures, extending the theory of acceptability indices. Classical ratios arise as special cases, while new examples-based on expected-loss, Lambda-quantile, and bibliometric indices-illustrate the framework's flexibility. Empirical applications to portfolio ranking and climate-risk insurance demonstrate its practical relevance.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

ranking metrics
acceptability indices
risk-adjusted performance
financial positions
insurance positions
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

ranking metrics
cash-quasiconcavity
acceptability indices
risk measures
axiomatic framework