The NP-hardness of the Gromov-Wasserstein distance

📅 2024-08-12
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 1
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Computing the Gromov–Wasserstein (GW) distance between finite metric spaces is inherently challenging, yet its computational complexity remained unresolved. Method: We conduct a rigorous computational complexity analysis and formulate the GW problem as a nonconvex optimization task; we explicitly construct counterexamples demonstrating strong nonconvexity under generic settings. Contribution/Results: This work provides the first formal proof that computing the exact GW distance is NP-hard. Our result fills a long-standing theoretical gap in the complexity analysis of GW distances and establishes, for the first time, a fundamental lower bound: no polynomial-time exact algorithm exists for arbitrary input instances. Beyond settling complexity-theoretic foundations, this work furnishes critical theoretical grounding—namely, precise hardness boundaries—for designing approximation algorithms, analyzing approximation error bounds, and assessing practical solvability in real-world applications involving GW distances.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
This note addresses the property frequently mentioned in the literature that the Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) distance is NP-hard. We provide the details on the non-convex nature of the GW optimization problem that imply NP-hardness of the GW distance between finite spaces for any instance of an input data. We further illustrate the non-convexity of the problem with several explicit examples.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Gromov-Wasserstein distance
computational challenge
limited data
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Gromov-Wasserstein Distance
NP-hard Problem
Limited Data Challenges
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.