🤖 AI Summary
This study systematically evaluates gender and political group biases in large language models (LLMs) for predicting voting outcomes in the European Parliament. Method: We introduce ParlAI Vote, an interactive auditing platform that uniquely integrates parliamentary debate transcripts, roll-call vote records, and multidimensional demographic attributes of politicians—including gender, political group, and nationality—to jointly model vote prediction and gender classification, enable error decomposition, and support counterfactual analysis. Built upon the EuroParlVote benchmark, it combines LLM-based inference, structured data retrieval, and visualization techniques to ensure reproducible bias detection and attribution. Contribution/Results: Experiments reveal significant demographic disparities in state-of-the-art LLMs’ vote predictions. ParlAI Vote serves simultaneously as a model auditing tool, pedagogical demonstration framework, and public engagement platform—establishing a novel paradigm and open-source infrastructure for fairness assessment in political AI.
📝 Abstract
We present ParlAI Vote, an interactive system for exploring European Parliament debates and votes, and for testing LLMs on vote prediction and bias analysis. This platform connects debate topics, speeches, and roll-call outcomes, and includes rich demographic data such as gender, age, country, and political group. Users can browse debates, inspect linked speeches, compare real voting outcomes with predictions from frontier LLMs, and view error breakdowns by demographic group. Visualizing the EuroParlVote benchmark and its core tasks of gender classification and vote prediction, ParlAI Vote highlights systematic performance bias in state-of-the-art LLMs. The system unifies data, models, and visual analytics in a single interface, lowering the barrier for reproducing findings, auditing behavior, and running counterfactual scenarios. It supports research, education, and public engagement with legislative decision-making, while making clear both the strengths and the limitations of current LLMs in political analysis.