Causal Inference for Case Studies in Behavioral Health

📅 2026-07-07
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of causal inference in N-of-1 behavioral health case studies, where unobserved confounding impedes valid estimation. The authors propose the Ω causal estimator, which achieves identification without measuring or adjusting for confounders by leveraging functional contrasts over the support set of the outcome variable, requiring only the positivity assumption. This approach pioneers a support-based—rather than distribution-based—framework for causal inference, integrating de Finetti’s subjective probability interpretation with a theory of intervention–observation support consistency. A recall-baseline substitution mechanism bridges support-level contrasts to mean-level causal effects. The method’s feasibility is demonstrated in a case study on cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety, offering clinicians a practical and robust tool for individualized causal inference.
📝 Abstract
We present a framework for causal inference in behavioral health case studies -- and observational N=1 settings more generally -- under unmeasured confounding. The framework rests on a class of causal estimands, termed $Ω$ estimands, defined as contrasts of functions of an outcome variable's support rather than its distribution. Because such estimands do not depend on how probability is distributed over supports, they are insensitive to the confounding that limits other methods. We prove that, in a structural causal model, the observational and interventional supports of an outcome coincide under a single assumption -- positivity -- without any requirement that confounders be known, measured, or adjusted for. Two optional conditions extend the framework: one licensing a client's recalled baseline as a stand-in for sparsely measured baseline periods, and one connecting support contrasts to conventional mean contrasts through an expected-average identity. We adopt a subjectivist (de Finetti) interpretation of probability and situate the framework within mandates for measurement-based care. A case study of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety illustrates an elementary approach a provider can use.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

causal inference
behavioral health
unmeasured confounding
case studies
N=1
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

causal inference
unmeasured confounding
support-based estimands
N=1 studies
positivity
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
S
Shane W. Sparkes
Wolf & Noble, Inc., Huntsville, Alabama, United States