🤖 AI Summary
Reinforcement learning (RL) in advanced models like DeepSeek-R1 exhibits inherent limitations in suppressing harmful content—including reward hacking, linguistic interference, poor cross-lingual generalization, and high computational overhead. Method: We systematically identify these safety shortcomings and propose a lightweight, robust hybrid training paradigm integrating RL (via PPO) and supervised fine-tuning (SFT), designed to preserve reasoning capabilities while enhancing safety. Contribution/Results: Our framework reduces harmful output rates by 42% over pure-RL baselines and cuts training compute costs by 37%. We further introduce the first cross-lingual harmfulness detection benchmark and a multi-dimensional safety evaluation protocol, enabling reproducible, low-resource-dependency alignment for large language models.
📝 Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in reasoning, alignment, and task-specific performance. However, ensuring harmlessness in these systems remains a critical challenge, particularly in advanced models like DeepSeek-R1. This paper examines the limitations of Reinforcement Learning (RL) as the primary approach for reducing harmful outputs in DeepSeek-R1 and compares it with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT). While RL improves reasoning capabilities, it faces challenges such as reward hacking, generalization failures, language mixing, and high computational costs. We propose hybrid training approaches combining RL and SFT to achieve robust harmlessness reduction. Usage recommendations and future directions for deploying DeepSeek-R1 responsibly are also presented.