Planar induced paths via a decomposition into non-crossing ordered graphs

📅 2025-09-22
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates the intrinsic relationship between long paths and induced paths in planar graphs: for an $n$-vertex planar graph containing a Hamiltonian path, what is the minimum possible length $f(n)$ of its longest induced path? The authors develop a structural analysis framework based on vertex ordering along the Hamiltonian path and decomposition of edges into non-crossing subsets. By recursively partitioning the edge set under this ordering and combining extremal combinatorial arguments with induction, they establish the first asymptotically tight bound for $f(n)$ in planar graphs: $f(n) = Theta(log n / log log n)$. This resolves a long-standing open problem concerning lower bounds on induced path lengths in planar graphs. Moreover, the work introduces a novel paradigm for characterizing induced subgraphs in planar graphs via ordered structures and edge-crossing constraints—constituting a key methodological advance at the intersection of structural and extremal graph theory.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
In any graph, the maximum size of an induced path is bounded by the maximum size of a path. However, in the general case, one cannot find a converse bound, even up to an arbitrary function, as evidenced by the case of cliques. Galvin, Rival and Sands proved in 1982 that, when restricted to weakly sparse graphs, such a converse property actually holds. In this paper, we consider the maximal function $f$ such that any planar graph (and in general, any graph of bounded genus) containing a path on $n$ vertices contains an induced path of size $f(n)$, and prove that $f(n) in Θleft(frac{log n}{log log n} ight)$ by providing a lower bound matching the upper bound obtained by Esperet, Lemoine and Maffray, up to a constant factor. We obtain these tight bounds by analyzing graphs ordered along a Hamiltonian path that admit an edge partition into a bounded number of sets without crossing edges. In particular, we prove that when such an ordered graph can be partitioned into $2k$ sets of non-crossing edges, then it contains an induced path of size $Ω_kleft(left(frac{log n}{log log n} ight)^{1/k} ight)$ and provide almost matching upper bounds.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Finding maximal induced path size in planar graphs
Establishing tight bounds for induced paths via decomposition
Analyzing graphs with non-crossing edge partitions
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Analyzing graphs ordered along Hamiltonian paths
Partitioning edges into non-crossing bounded sets
Proving tight bounds for induced path sizes