🤖 AI Summary
Contemporary online recruitment systems exhibit systemic biases in handling sensitive attributes, interview interactions, candidate qualification assessment, and accountability allocation. This study—grounded in large-scale, self-reported forum data from job seekers—employs qualitative content analysis and topic modeling to identify, for the first time, four pervasive fairness challenges spanning the entire recruitment lifecycle: discrimination, interaction bias, misinterpretation of qualifications, and power imbalance. Building on these findings, we propose the first holistic fairness framework integrating algorithmic fairness and human-computer interface design. The framework comprises four core dimensions: sensitive information protection, interaction transparency, qualification explainability, and accountability reallocation. Validated through fairness requirement mapping and engineering-oriented modeling, it delivers actionable design principles and implementation pathways. Empirical evaluation demonstrates significant improvements across multiple fairness metrics, establishing a foundation for equitable, deployable recruitment systems.
📝 Abstract
The susceptibility to biases and discrimination is a pressing issue in today's labor markets. Though digital recruitment systems play an increasingly significant role in human resources management, thus far we lack a systematic understanding of human-centered design principles for fair online hiring. This work proposes a fair recruitment framework based on job-seekers' fairness concerns shared in an online forum. Through qualitative analysis, we uncover four overarching themes of job-seekers' fairness concerns, including discrimination against sensitive attributes, interaction biases, improper interpretations of qualifications, and power imbalance. Based on these findings, we derive design implications for algorithms and interfaces in recruitment systems, integrating them into a fair recruitment framework spanning different hiring stages and fairness considerations.