Disagreement-Regularized Importance Sampling for Adversarial Label Corruption

📅 2026-05-08
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

198K/year
🤖 AI Summary
Standard importance sampling is highly susceptible to high-norm adversarial outliers under label corruption, leading to severe estimation bias. This work proposes a subsampling method that leverages disagreement in loss-based ranking among an ensemble of proxy models, introducing ranking disagreement as a novel regularizer within the importance sampling framework to effectively identify and filter contaminated samples. By integrating the ε-contamination model with finite-sample concentration analysis, the approach offers rigorous theoretical guarantees. Empirical evaluations on benchmark datasets demonstrate strong robustness against high-norm attacks, significantly outperforming magnitude-dependent methods such as EL2N and exhibiting complementary behavior to training-dynamics-based approaches like AUM.
📝 Abstract
Standard Importance Sampling (IS) collapses under label corruption because high-norm examples, prioritized for variance reduction, are often adversarial outliers. We formalize this misalignment using an $\varepsilon$-contamination model and propose Disagreement-Regularized Importance Sampling (DR-IS), a sub-sampling method based on loss rank-disagreement across independent proxy ensemble. We prove finite-sample concentration bounds showing that the empirical rank disagreement of bulk corrupted examples is bounded above, and that of boundary-clean examples bounded below, both at rate $O(\sqrt{\log(N/δ)/K})$ with probability $1-δ$; when the structural expectation gap $Δ'$ between the two groups is positive and the boundary-clean set is at least as large as the selected subset, these bounds certify strict separation and control the contamination rate of the selected subset. Empirically, DR-IS remains robust under targeted high-norm attacks that break magnitude-based methods such as the Error $L_2$-norm (EL2N) on benchmark datasets. DR-IS complements training-dynamics approaches like Area Under the Margin ranking (AUM), offering improved robustness in the loss-aligned regime alongside explicit finite-sample concentration certificates and a contamination bound limiting noise leakage from the statistical tail of corrupted points.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

adversarial label corruption
importance sampling
outlier contamination
robust subsampling
high-norm attacks
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Disagreement-Regularized Importance Sampling
adversarial label corruption
rank disagreement
finite-sample concentration bounds
proxy ensemble
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.