ECTIL: Label-efficient Computational Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) assessment in breast cancer: Multicentre validation in 2,340 patients with breast cancer

📅 2025-01-24
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Manual assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is time-consuming, costly, and suffers from poor generalizability. Method: We propose ECTIL, a lightweight deep learning framework for TIL quantification that minimizes annotation burden—requiring only hundreds of coarse-grained clinical scores—and leverages a pathology foundation model to extract morphological features from whole-slide images (WSIs) for end-to-end regression of TIL levels. Results: Across five independent multicenter external cohorts, ECTIL achieves strong agreement with pathologist assessments (Pearson *r* = 0.54–0.74; AUROC = 0.80–0.94); each 10% increase in ECTIL score correlates with a significant 14% reduction in overall survival risk (HR = 0.86, *p* < 0.01). Model training completes in ~10 minutes, balancing clinical feasibility and predictive reliability—offering an efficient tool for immunotherapy patient selection and prognostic evaluation.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The level of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is a prognostic factor for patients with (triple-negative) breast cancer (BC). Computational TIL assessment (CTA) has the potential to assist pathologists in this labour-intensive task, but current CTA models rely heavily on many detailed annotations. We propose and validate a fundamentally simpler deep learning based CTA that can be trained in only ten minutes on hundredfold fewer pathologist annotations. We collected whole slide images (WSIs) with TILs scores and clinical data of 2,340 patients with BC from six cohorts including three randomised clinical trials. Morphological features were extracted from whole slide images (WSIs) using a pathology foundation model. Our label-efficient Computational stromal TIL assessment model (ECTIL) directly regresses the TILs score from these features. ECTIL trained on only a few hundred samples (ECTIL-TCGA) showed concordance with the pathologist over five heterogeneous external cohorts (r=0.54-0.74, AUROC=0.80-0.94). Training on all slides of five cohorts (ECTIL-combined) improved results on a held-out test set (r=0.69, AUROC=0.85). Multivariable Cox regression analyses indicated that every 10% increase of ECTIL scores was associated with improved overall survival independent of clinicopathological variables (HR 0.86, p<0.01), similar to the pathologist score (HR 0.87, p<0.001). We demonstrate that ECTIL is highly concordant with an expert pathologist and obtains a similar hazard ratio. ECTIL has a fundamentally simpler design than existing methods and can be trained on orders of magnitude fewer annotations. Such a CTA may be used to pre-screen patients for, e.g., immunotherapy clinical trial inclusion, or as a tool to assist clinicians in the diagnostic work-up of patients with BC. Our model is available under an open source licence (https://github.com/nki-ai/ectil).
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs)
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Computer-Aided Assessment
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

ECTIL
Breast Cancer TIL Assessment
Open-source Model
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Y
Y. Schirris
University of Amsterdam, Science Park 402, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands; AI for Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
R
Rosie Voorthuis
Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
M
M. Opdam
Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
M
M. Liefaard
Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
G
G. S. Sonke
Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
G
G. Dackus
Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
V
Vincent de Jong
Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Y
Yuwei Wang
Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
A
A. V. Rossum
Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
T
T. Steenbruggen
Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
L
L. Steggink
Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
L
Liesbeth G.E. de Vries
Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
M
Marc van de Vijver
Department of Pathology, The Amsterdam University Medical Centre, AUMC, The University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
R
Roberto Salgado
Department of Pathology, ZAS Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Centre, Melbourne, Australia
E
E. Gavves
University of Amsterdam, Science Park 402, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
P
P. Diest
Division of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
S
Sabine C. Linn
Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Division of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Jonas Teuwen
Jonas Teuwen
Netherlands Cancer Institute / Radboud University Medical Center
OncologyArtificial IntelligenceDeep Learning
R
Renee Menezes
Biostatistics Centre, Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
M
M. Kok
Department of Tumour Biology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
H
Hugo M Horlings
Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands