🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates the *k*-Kemeny problem—minimizing the total number of adjacent swaps required to transform a given set of ordinal votes into at most *k* distinct total orders—within structured preference domains (e.g., single-peaked, single-crossing, group-separable, Euclidean). Through computational complexity analysis and combinatorial optimization, we establish that the problem remains NP-hard in nearly all such domains, even for *k* = 2. Building on the *k*-Kemeny score, we propose a novel diversity quantification framework that systematically measures and ranks the expressive capacity of different domains. Our results reveal that, despite structural constraints, these domains can support highly heterogeneous ranking distributions. The core contribution is a formal model linking structural preference diversity to computational intractability, accompanied by a principled, comparable, and quantifiable benchmark for evaluating domain expressiveness and algorithmic hardness.
📝 Abstract
In the k-Kemeny problem, we are given an ordinal election, i.e., a collection of votes ranking the candidates from best to worst, and we seek the smallest number of swaps of adjacent candidates that ensure that the election has at most k different rankings. We study this problem for a number of structured domains, including the single-peaked, single-crossing, group-separable, and Euclidean ones. We obtain two kinds of results: (1) We show that k-Kemeny remains intractable under most of these domains, even for k=2, and (2) we use k-Kemeny to rank these domains in terms of their diversity.