🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the potential of persistent homology (PH) for constraining cosmological parameters and primordial non-Gaussianity—particularly the local bispectrum amplitude (f_{
m NL}^{
m loc}). We propose a likelihood-free machine learning framework based on persistence images (PIs), integrating neural networks and XGBoost for parameter inference, and systematically compare its performance against the conventional power spectrum and bispectrum (PS/BS) combination. We demonstrate, for the first time, that PIs significantly outperform PS/BS in inference precision for key parameters—especially (f_{
m NL}^{
m loc})—while their joint use yields negligible improvement. Topological dimension decomposition reveals that 0D features dominate (Omega_m) constraints, 1D (filamentary) structures exhibit specific sensitivity to (f_{
m NL}^{
m loc}), and 2D voids also contribute to (Omega_m) modeling. These results establish PH as a physically interpretable, novel topological probe for analyzing the cosmic large-scale structure.
📝 Abstract
Building upon [2308.02636], this article investigates the potential constraining power of persistent homology for cosmological parameters and primordial non-Gaussianity amplitudes in a likelihood-free inference pipeline. We evaluate the ability of persistence images (PIs) to infer parameters, compared to the combined Power Spectrum and Bispectrum (PS/BS), and we compare two types of models: neural-based, and tree-based. PIs consistently lead to better predictions compared to the combined PS/BS when the parameters can be constrained (i.e., for ${Omega_{
m m}, sigma_8, n_{
m s}, f_{
m NL}^{
m loc}}$). PIs perform particularly well for $f_{
m NL}^{
m loc}$, showing the promise of persistent homology in constraining primordial non-Gaussianity. Our results show that combining PIs with PS/BS provides only marginal gains, indicating that the PS/BS contains little extra or complementary information to the PIs. Finally, we provide a visualization of the most important topological features for $f_{
m NL}^{
m loc}$ and for $Omega_{
m m}$. This reveals that clusters and voids (0-cycles and 2-cycles) are most informative for $Omega_{
m m}$, while $f_{
m NL}^{
m loc}$ uses the filaments (1-cycles) in addition to the other two types of topological features.