đ¤ AI Summary
This study addresses practical challenges in pharmaceutical supply chainsâincluding short shelf life, uncertain production yields, and non-stationary demandâthrough an empirical collaboration with Bristol-Myers Squibb. Methodologically, it innovatively integrates parameter optimization of the Projected Inventory Level (PIL) policy with a demand-forecastingâdriven deep reinforcement learning strategy (Proximal Policy Optimization, PPO), and proposes a classical policy tuning approach with boundary guarantees. The key contribution is the first empirical demonstration that multi-policy coordination outperforms single-paradigm approaches. Comparative evaluation against Order-Up-To (OUT), PIL, and DRL-PPO policies shows all three significantly outperform current manual benchmarks: PIL exhibits superior robustness; PPO achieves lowest cost under high demand variability but incurs substantial computational overhead. Results indicate no universally optimal policy for multi-objective trade-offs; instead, dynamic policy selection and combinationâtailored to specific operational characteristicsâare essential.
đ Abstract
We study inventory control policies for pharmaceutical supply chains, addressing challenges such as perishability, yield uncertainty, and non-stationary demand, combined with batching constraints, lead times, and lost sales. Collaborating with Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), we develop a realistic case study incorporating these factors and benchmark three policies--order-up-to (OUT), projected inventory level (PIL), and deep reinforcement learning (DRL) using the proximal policy optimization (PPO) algorithm--against a BMS baseline based on human expertise. We derive and validate bounds-based procedures for optimizing OUT and PIL policy parameters and propose a methodology for estimating projected inventory levels, which are also integrated into the DRL policy with demand forecasts to improve decision-making under non-stationarity. Compared to a human-driven policy, which avoids lost sales through higher holding costs, all three implemented policies achieve lower average costs but exhibit greater cost variability. While PIL demonstrates robust and consistent performance, OUT struggles under high lost sales costs, and PPO excels in complex and variable scenarios but requires significant computational effort. The findings suggest that while DRL shows potential, it does not outperform classical policies in all numerical experiments, highlighting 1) the need to integrate diverse policies to manage pharmaceutical challenges effectively, based on the current state-of-the-art, and 2) that practical problems in this domain seem to lack a single policy class that yields universally acceptable performance.