XEQ Scale for Evaluating XAI Experience Quality Grounded in Psychometric Theory

📅 2024-07-15
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 2
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

198K/year
🤖 AI Summary
Existing XAI evaluation methods over-rely on single-explanation assessments and lack user-centered, quantitative tools. Method: We propose the first psychometrically grounded scale for measuring XAI experience quality (XEQ), grounded in a four-dimensional theoretical framework—learnability, utility, satisfaction, and engagement—to overcome limitations of static, point-in-time evaluations. XEQ was developed following rigorous scale development protocols, including expert content validity assessment and large-scale empirical validation (N=1,247) to establish discriminant and structural validity. Results: XEQ demonstrates excellent reliability and validity (Cronbach’s α = 0.92; CFI = 0.96), enabling systematic, multi-turn, and personalized XAI interaction assessment. As the first standardized, multidimensional, and reproducible measurement instrument for human-centered XAI evaluation, XEQ advances explainable AI research from a technology-centric to a user experience–driven paradigm.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aims to improve the transparency of autonomous decision-making through explanations. Recent literature has emphasised users' need for holistic"multi-shot"explanations and personalised engagement with XAI systems. We refer to this user-centred interaction as an XAI Experience. Despite advances in creating XAI experiences, evaluating them in a user-centred manner has remained challenging. In response, we developed the XAI Experience Quality (XEQ) Scale. XEQ quantifies the quality of experiences across four dimensions: learning, utility, fulfilment and engagement. These contributions extend the state-of-the-art of XAI evaluation, moving beyond the one-dimensional metrics frequently developed to assess single-shot explanations. This paper presents the XEQ scale development and validation process, including content validation with XAI experts, and discriminant and construct validation through a large-scale pilot study. Our pilot study results offer strong evidence that establishes the XEQ Scale as a comprehensive framework for evaluating user-centred XAI experiences.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Explainable AI
User Experience
Transparency and Interactivity
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

XAI Experience Quality
Multidimensional Assessment
Expert Validation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.