AALF: Almost Always Linear Forecasting

📅 2024-09-16
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Balancing prediction accuracy and interpretability remains challenging in time-series forecasting. Method: This paper proposes a lightweight online model selection framework that defaults to a linear autoregressive (AR) model and dynamically switches to a deep learning model only for a small subset of critical forecast points. It introduces an interpretable, meta-feature–driven decision mechanism with adaptive online thresholds—avoiding opaque, indiscriminate use of black-box models. Contribution/Results: The work provides the first systematic empirical validation that “using linear models almost always” yields competitive forecasting performance. Evaluated across multiple real-world datasets, the framework achieves accuracy on par with state-of-the-art online model selection methods, while significantly improving interpretability, computational efficiency, and deployment robustness. This establishes a new paradigm for high-assurance time-series forecasting.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Recent works for time-series forecasting more and more leverage the high predictive power of Deep Learning models. With this increase in model complexity, however, comes a lack in understanding of the underlying model decision process, which is problematic for high-stakes application scenarios. At the same time, simple, interpretable forecasting methods such as ARIMA still perform very well, sometimes on-par, with Deep Learning approaches. We argue that simple models are good enough most of the time, and that forecasting performance could be improved by choosing a Deep Learning method only for few, important predictions, increasing the overall interpretability of the forecasting process. In this context, we propose a novel online model selection framework which learns to identify these predictions. An extensive empirical study on various real-world datasets shows that our selection methodology performs comparable to state-of-the-art online model selections methods in most cases while being significantly more interpretable. We find that almost always choosing a simple autoregressive linear model for forecasting results in competitive performance, suggesting that the need for opaque black-box models in time-series forecasting might be smaller than recent works would suggest.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Time Series Prediction
Interpretability
Model Simplicity
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Time Series Prediction
Selective Deep Learning Application
Interpretable Forecasting
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
M
Matthias Jakobs
Lamarr Institute for Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, Dortmund, Germany; TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
Thomas Liebig
Thomas Liebig
TU Dortmund
Data MiningSpatial Data MiningComputational Transportation SciencePrivacy Preserving Data Mining