🤖 AI Summary
Regret minimization methods typically guarantee only average-policy convergence, requiring substantial computation or introducing approximation errors; while existing reward transformation (RT) frameworks achieve last-iterate convergence, they rely on manual hyperparameter tuning, often violating theoretical assumptions and leading to oscillation, slow convergence, or suboptimal solutions.
Method: We propose an adaptive reward transformation mechanism that dynamically adjusts parameters within the RTRM/RTCFR framework, eliminating manual intervention and aligning theoretical convergence guarantees with empirical performance. The mechanism online balances exploration and exploitation to optimize regret accumulation.
Contribution/Results: Our approach achieves linear last-iterate convergence across diverse games and ensures the final-iterate policy efficiently and stably approximates a Nash equilibrium. Experiments on standard benchmarks demonstrate significant improvements over current state-of-the-art algorithms.
📝 Abstract
Regret minimization is a powerful method for finding Nash equilibria in Normal-Form Games (NFGs) and Extensive-Form Games (EFGs), but it typically guarantees convergence only for the average strategy. However, computing the average strategy requires significant computational resources or introduces additional errors, limiting its practical applicability. The Reward Transformation (RT) framework was introduced to regret minimization to achieve last-iterate convergence through reward function regularization. However, it faces practical challenges: its performance is highly sensitive to manually tuned parameters, which often deviate from theoretical convergence conditions, leading to slow convergence, oscillations, or stagnation in local optima.
Inspired by previous work, we propose an adaptive technique to address these issues, ensuring better consistency between theoretical guarantees and practical performance for RT Regret Matching (RTRM), RT Counterfactual Regret Minimization (RTCFR), and their variants in solving NFGs and EFGs more effectively. Our adaptive methods dynamically adjust parameters, balancing exploration and exploitation while improving regret accumulation, ultimately enhancing asymptotic last-iterate convergence and achieving linear convergence. Experimental results demonstrate that our methods significantly accelerate convergence, outperforming state-of-the-art algorithms.