🤖 AI Summary
Although supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is computationally efficient, its generalization capability is limited by the absence of in-policy data. This work proposes a novel SFT framework grounded in Distribution Discrimination Theory (DDT), which explicitly steers the model toward the in-policy distribution through both the loss function and data alignment. Specifically, the approach integrates an IDFT loss and a Hinted Decoding-based data realignment technique to guide learning at both optimization and data levels. The resulting method preserves the training efficiency of standard SFT while substantially improving generalization performance—achieving results comparable to offline reinforcement learning algorithms such as DPO and SimPO. This offers a practical and efficient alternative for scenarios where deploying reinforcement learning is infeasible.
📝 Abstract
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is computationally efficient but often yields inferior generalization compared to reinforcement learning (RL). This gap is primarily driven by RL's use of on-policy data. We propose a framework to bridge this chasm by enabling On-Policy SFT. We first present \textbf{\textit{Distribution Discriminant Theory (DDT)}}, which explains and quantifies the alignment between data and the model-induced distribution. Leveraging DDT, we introduce two complementary techniques: (i) \textbf{\textit{In-Distribution Finetuning (IDFT)}}, a loss-level method to enhance generalization ability of SFT, and (ii) \textbf{\textit{Hinted Decoding}}, a data-level technique that can re-align the training corpus to the model's distribution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework achieves generalization performance on par with prominent offline RL algorithms, including DPO and SimPO, while maintaining the efficiency of an SFT pipeline. The proposed framework thus offers a practical alternative in domains where RL is infeasible. We open-source the code here: https://github.com/zhangmiaosen2000/Towards-On-Policy-SFT