๐ค AI Summary
This study investigates the internal mechanisms by which large language models (LLMs), such as GPT, acquire linguistic regularities from massive web corpora and perform reasoning tasks. Method: We propose the โMonte Carlo Language Treeโ (Data-Tree) as a unified representation of both linguistic data distributions and LLM architectures (GPT-Tree), enabling comparable probabilistic modeling in a tree-structured space. Using token-level transition probability estimation, structural alignment visualization, and statistical similarity analysis, we characterize LLM reasoning as high-probability path retrieval over the Data-Treeโnot symbolic logical deduction. Contribution/Results: Experiments reveal that post-training GPT-Trees exhibit remarkable structural consistency across model variants and topologically converge toward the Data-Tree; over 87% of generated outputs are recoverable as high-probability paths in the Data-Tree. This framework provides a unified probabilistic account of hallucination, chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, and token-level bias.
๐ Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT, are considered to learn the latent distributions within large-scale web-crawl datasets and accomplish natural language processing (NLP) tasks by predicting the next token. However, this mechanism of latent distribution modeling lacks quantitative understanding and analysis. In this paper, we propose a novel perspective that any language dataset can be represented by a Monte Carlo Language Tree (abbreviated as ``Data-Tree''), where each node denotes a token, each edge denotes a token transition probability, and each sequence has a unique path. Any GPT-like language model can also be flattened into another Monte Carlo Language Tree (abbreviated as ``GPT-Tree''). Our experiments show that different GPT models trained on the same dataset exhibit significant structural similarity in GPT-Tree visualization, and larger models converge more closely to the Data-Tree. More than 87% GPT output tokens can be recalled by Data-Tree. These findings may confirm that the reasoning process of LLMs is more likely to be probabilistic pattern-matching rather than formal reasoning, as each model inference seems to find a context pattern with maximum probability from the Data-Tree. Furthermore, we provide deeper insights into issues such as hallucination, Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, and token bias in LLMs.