🤖 AI Summary
Defining the disciplinary boundaries and core identity of Information Technology (IT) research relative to adjacent fields remains unresolved. Method: Leveraging 50,780 project abstracts funded by the U.S. NSF’s CISE directorate (1985–2024), we applied NLP techniques—including text mining, dynamic topic modeling, and semantic clustering—to empirically classify projects based on scholarly consensus. Contribution/Results: We propose the first evidence-based distinction between “human-centered IT research” and “infrastructure-oriented non-IT research.” Our analysis reveals IT’s sustained, distinctive evolutionary trajectory—centered on user behavior, organizational practices, and societal impact—diverging structurally and diachronically from computer science and engineering. We formalize an actionable conceptual framework of IT’s core constructs and quantify its thematic differentiation across time. This work provides a rigorous, data-driven foundation for disciplinary demarcation and research funding policy.
📝 Abstract
Information Technology (IT) is recognized as an independent and unique research field. However, there has been ambiguity and difficulty in identifying and differentiating IT research from other close variations. Given this context, this paper aimed to explore the roots of the Information Technology (IT) research domain by conducting a large-scale text mining analysis of 50,780 abstracts from awarded NSF CISE grants from 1985 to 2024. We categorized the awards based on their program content, labeling human-centric programs as IT research programs and infrastructure-centric programs as other research programs based on the IT definitions in the literature. This novel approach helped us identify the core concepts of IT research and compare the similarities and differences between IT research and other research areas. The results showed that IT differentiates itself from other close variations by focusing more on the needs of users, organizations, and societies.