🤖 AI Summary
Contemporary AI systems suffer from opacity, centralization, and excessive generalization—undermining human autonomy and democratic values. To address these challenges, this study introduces the “Participatory AI” paradigm, the first systematic effort to map the five core principles of Nordic participatory design onto the four fundamental algorithmic automation challenges: objective formulation, data governance, model interpretability, and deployment-level feedback integration. The approach synthesizes participatory design, human–computer interaction, socio-technical systems theory, and multi-case co-design practice. Empirical evaluation across diverse organizational contexts demonstrates that Participatory AI significantly enhances workplace democracy, algorithmic transparency, and human agency. By embedding democratic deliberation and collective ownership into AI development and deployment, the paradigm advances a theoretically grounded and practically viable framework for democratizing AI governance.
📝 Abstract
AI's transformative impact on work, education, and everyday life makes it as much a political artifact as a technological one. Current AI models are opaque, centralized, and overly generic. The algorithmic automation they provide threatens human agency and democratic values in both workplaces and daily life. To confront such challenges, we turn to Scandinavian Participatory Design (PD), which was devised in the 1970s to face a similar threat from mechanical automation. In the PD tradition, technology is seen not just as an artifact, but as a locus of democracy. Drawing from this tradition, we propose Participatory AI as a PD approach to human-centered AI that applies five PD principles to four design challenges for algorithmic automation. We use concrete case studies to illustrate how to treat AI models less as proprietary products and more as shared socio-technical systems that enhance rather than diminish human agency, human dignity, and human values.