🤖 AI Summary
A lack of standardized, quantitative metrics for information environment manipulation targeting Web-scale knowledge graphs hinders systematic analysis and cross-study comparison. Method: This paper adapts the BEND framework to the Web graph setting, proposing a novel set of quantifiable, SEO-driven information manipulation indicators that capture both community-level structural anomalies and SEO-specific behavioral signals. The approach integrates graph topological analysis with SEO signal modeling and validates indicator validity via face validity assessment. Contribution/Results: Applied to two empirical case studies involving Kremlin-affiliated websites, the metrics successfully detect covert manipulative link patterns and coordinated content strategies, substantially enhancing interpretability and detectability of search-oriented information manipulation. This work bridges a critical gap in Web-scale information manipulation quantification and delivers a reusable analytical framework for platform governance and algorithmic auditing.
📝 Abstract
Attempts to manipulate webgraphs can have many downstream impacts, but analysts lack shared quantitative metrics to characterize actions taken to manipulate information environments at this level. We demonstrate how the BEND framework can be used to characterize attempts to manipulate webgraph information environments, and propose quantitative metrics for BEND community maneuvers. We demonstrate the face validity of our proposed Webgraph BEND metrics by using them to characterize two small web-graphs containing SEO-boosted Kremlin-aligned websites. We demonstrate how our proposed metrics improve BEND scores in webgraph settings and demonstrate the usefulness of our metrics in characterizing webgraph information environments. These metrics offer analysts a systematic and standardized way to characterize attempts to manipulate webgraphs using common Search Engine Optimization tactics.