Adapting Public Personas: A Multimodal Study of U.S. Legislators' Cross-Platform Social Media Strategies

📅 2025-09-12
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Prior cross-platform social media research has predominantly focused on textual content, neglecting systematic multimodal analysis of integrated image–text strategies. Method: This study pioneers the systematic application of large multimodal models (LMMs) to conduct fine-grained, joint analysis of image–text posts published by members of the 118th U.S. Congress across Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), TikTok, and official websites. By integrating platform affordances, audience demographic profiles, and partisan objectives, the analysis uncovers divergent image-crafting mechanisms. Results: Democrats strategically leverage TikTok for campaign-oriented visual content, whereas Republicans favor traditional platforms—deploying ideologically explicit text and formal, authoritative imagery to reinforce institutional credibility. The study fills a critical gap in political communication research by delivering the first empirical, cross-platform, multimodal analysis of partisan self-presentation, offering both a novel methodological framework and robust empirical evidence for understanding strategic identity construction in digital politics.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Current cross-platform social media analyses primarily focus on the textual features of posts, often lacking multimodal analysis due to past technical limitations. This study addresses this gap by examining how U.S. legislators in the 118th Congress strategically use social media platforms to adapt their public personas by emphasizing different topics and stances. Leveraging the Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) for fine-grained text and image analysis, we examine 540 legislators personal website and social media, including Facebook, X (Twitter), TikTok. We find that legislators tailor their topics and stances to project distinct public personas on different platforms. Democrats tend to prioritize TikTok, which has a younger user base, while Republicans are more likely to express stronger stances on established platforms such as Facebook and X (Twitter), which offer broader audience reach. Topic analysis reveals alignment with constituents' key concerns, while stances and polarization vary by platform and topic. Large-scale image analysis shows Republicans employing more formal visuals to project authority, whereas Democrats favor campaign-oriented imagery. These findings highlight the potential interplay between platform features, audience demographics, and partisan goals in shaping political communication. By providing insights into multimodal strategies, this study contributes to understanding the role of social media in modern political discourse and communications.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Analyzing multimodal social media strategies of U.S. legislators
Examining cross-platform persona adaptation through text and images
Investigating partisan differences in platform-specific communication tactics
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Leveraging Large Multimodal Models for cross-platform analysis
Analyzing 540 legislators' text and image content simultaneously
Employing fine-grained multimodal analysis of social media posts
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Weihong Qi
Weihong Qi
Indiana University, Bloomington
Artificial IntelligenceNatural Language ProcessingData MiningComputational Social Science
A
Anushka Dave
Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA
L
Ling Chen
Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA