π€ AI Summary
Existing large language modelβbased approaches for scientific idea generation rely on flat text retrieval, which struggles to explicitly model the relationships among problems, methods, mechanisms, and findings across papers, often resulting in redundant and weakly relevant contexts. This work proposes Graph2Idea, a novel framework that introduces knowledge graphs into retrieval-augmented scientific idea generation. By converting retrieved literature into structured triples and dynamically constructing a target-centered knowledge graph, the method extracts compact, traceable graph-structured contexts. A two-stage generation pipeline then guides the large language model to synthesize novel, feasible, and high-quality research ideas. Experimental results demonstrate that Graph2Idea significantly outperforms existing methods on a scientific idea generation benchmark, with notable improvements in novelty (0.45β0.52), quality (0.24β0.29), and feasibility (0.22β0.28).
π Abstract
Generating novel, feasible, and high-quality research ideas is an important yet challenging task in scientific discovery.Recent Large Language Model (LLM)-based methods often ground idea generation with retrieved literature, but the retrieved evidence is usually provided as flat text, such as titles, abstracts, or summaries. Such flat contexts may contain redundant or weakly relevant information, while making cross-paper relations among problems, methods, mechanisms, and findings difficult to identify and trace.To address this challenge, we propose Graph2Idea, a knowledge graph-guided framework for retrieval-augmented scientific idea generation.Graph2Idea first retrieves papers according to the input topic, transforms them into structured knowledge triples, and dynamically constructs a target-centered knowledge graph to make literature relations explicit.It then extracts compact graph-derived contexts that retain target-relevant relational evidence while reducing noisy textual input.Based on these contexts, a two-stage generation process first identifies promising research directions and then guides the LLM to synthesize candidate ideas from graph-grounded evidence.Experiments on a scientific idea generation benchmark show that Graph2Idea outperforms representative baselines under the automatic evaluation protocol.Compared with the strongest baseline scores, it improves Novelty from 0.45 to 0.52, Quality from 0.24 to 0.29, and Feasibility from 0.22 to 0.28.These results suggest that graph-structured evidence helps LLMs generate research ideas through more explicit, compact, and traceable recombination of prior scientific knowledge.