De-centering the (Traditional) User: Multistakeholder Evaluation of Recommender Systems

📅 2025-01-09
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing evaluation paradigms for multi-stakeholder recommender systems suffer from misalignment due to conflicting values and heterogeneous objectives among users, producers, platforms, and other stakeholders. Method: We propose the first structured multi-stakeholder evaluation framework, integrating value-sensitive design, multi-objective trade-off modeling, and domain-adapted metric engineering to establish an end-to-end pathway—from value alignment to actionable metrics—and define cross-scenario generalizable evaluation dimensions. Contribution: Our work breaks the dominant single-stakeholder utility paradigm by establishing a theory–metric–empirical closed loop; we release an extensible evaluation guideline covering three representative domains—education, e-commerce, and content platforms; and we set a new community benchmark for multi-stakeholder evaluation in RecSys.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Multistakeholder recommender systems are those that account for the impacts and preferences of multiple groups of individuals, not just the end users receiving recommendations. Due to their complexity, evaluating these systems cannot be restricted to the overall utility of a single stakeholder, as is often the case of more mainstream recommender system applications. In this article, we focus our discussion on the intricacies of the evaluation of multistakeholder recommender systems. We bring attention to the different aspects involved in the evaluation of multistakeholder recommender systems - from the range of stakeholders involved (including but not limited to producers and consumers) to the values and specific goals of each relevant stakeholder. Additionally, we discuss how to move from theoretical principles to practical implementation, providing specific use case examples. Finally, we outline open research directions for the RecSys community to explore. We aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners about how to think about these complex and domain-dependent issues of evaluation in the course of designing, developing, and researching applications with multistakeholder aspects.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Multistakeholder Evaluation
Diverse Needs
Recommender Systems
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Diverse Stakeholder Needs
Multi-Criteria Evaluation
Recommendation Systems
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Robin Burke
Robin Burke
University of Colorado, Boulder
Artificial IntelligenceUser ModelingPersonalizationAlgorithmic FairnessRecommender Systems
G
G. Adomavicius
Department of Information and Decision Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Toine Bogers
Toine Bogers
Associate professor, IT University of Copenhagen
recommender systemscomputational HRinformation retrievalexpert search
T
T. D. Noia
Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy
Dominik Kowald
Dominik Kowald
Professor @ University of Graz, Research Area Head @ Know Center, PhD & Habilitation @ TU Graz
Recommender SystemsAlgorithmic BiasTrustworthy AIInformation RetrievalDigital Humanities
Julia Neidhardt
Julia Neidhardt
TU Wien
Recommender SystemsUser ModelingSocial Network AnalysisDigital Humanism
O
Ozlem Ozgobek
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
M
M. S. Pera
TU Delft, Delft, Netherlands
N
N. Tintarev
Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
J
Jürgen Ziegler
University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany