Large Physics Models: Towards a collaborative approach with Large Language Models and Foundation Models

📅 2025-01-09
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the insufficient domain specificity of AI models in physics research by proposing a roadmap for developing Large Physics Models (LPMs). Methodologically, it constructs a dedicated AI architecture integrating large language models (LLMs), symbolic reasoning, experimental data analysis, and scientific literature semantic modeling; introduces, for the first time, an interdisciplinary co-development mechanism modeled on particle physics collaborations; and establishes a tripartite framework encompassing development, evaluation, and philosophical reflection. Key contributions include: the first systematic definition of LPMs’ conceptual scope and staged implementation pathway; identification of critical technical bottlenecks and ethical challenges; proposal of initial interdisciplinary organizational blueprints; and advancement of LLMs from generic tools to trustworthy, insight-generating collaborative research agents. This work lays both theoretical foundations and practical paradigms for AI infrastructure in physics.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
This paper explores ideas and provides a potential roadmap for the development and evaluation of physics-specific large-scale AI models, which we call Large Physics Models (LPMs). These models, based on foundation models such as Large Language Models (LLMs) - trained on broad data - are tailored to address the demands of physics research. LPMs can function independently or as part of an integrated framework. This framework can incorporate specialized tools, including symbolic reasoning modules for mathematical manipulations, frameworks to analyse specific experimental and simulated data, and mechanisms for synthesizing theories and scientific literature. We begin by examining whether the physics community should actively develop and refine dedicated models, rather than relying solely on commercial LLMs. We then outline how LPMs can be realized through interdisciplinary collaboration among experts in physics, computer science, and philosophy of science. To integrate these models effectively, we identify three key pillars: Development, Evaluation, and Philosophical Reflection. Development focuses on constructing models capable of processing physics texts, mathematical formulations, and diverse physical data. Evaluation assesses accuracy and reliability by testing and benchmarking. Finally, Philosophical Reflection encompasses the analysis of broader implications of LLMs in physics, including their potential to generate new scientific understanding and what novel collaboration dynamics might arise in research. Inspired by the organizational structure of experimental collaborations in particle physics, we propose a similarly interdisciplinary and collaborative approach to building and refining Large Physics Models. This roadmap provides specific objectives, defines pathways to achieve them, and identifies challenges that must be addressed to realise physics-specific large scale AI models.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Artificial Intelligence in Physics
Model Development
Interdisciplinary Collaboration
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Large Physical Models (LPM)
Interdisciplinary Collaboration
Knowledge Discovery in Physics
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
K
Kristian G. Barman
CLPS - Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, UGent, BE
Sascha Caron
Sascha Caron
Associate Professor (UHD), Radboud University Nijmegen and Nikhef, Amsterdam
Particle PhysicsMachine LearningAstrophysicsArtificial IntelligenceDark Matter
Emily Sullivan
Emily Sullivan
Senior Lecturer, University of Edinburgh
EpistemologyPhilosophy of SciencePhilosophy of TechnologyPhilosophy of AI
Henk W. de Regt
Henk W. de Regt
Professor of Philosophy of Natural Sciences, Institute for Science in Society, Radboud University
scientific understandingscientific explanationphilosophy of sciencevalues in science
R
Roberto Ruiz de Austri
Instituto de Física Corpuscular (IFIC), CSIC-UV, Spain
M
Mieke Boon
University of Twente, The Netherlands
Michael Farber
Michael Farber
TU Dresden & ScaDS.AI, Germany
S
Stefan Fröse
ErUM-Data-Hub & TU Dortmund University, Germany
Faegheh Hasibi
Faegheh Hasibi
Assistant Professor, Radboud University
Information retrievalNatural language processingConversational AI
Andreas Ipp
Andreas Ipp
TU Wien
Theoretical PhysicsQuantum Field TheoryHigh Energy Physics
R
Rukshak Kapoor
Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology (TIET), Patiala, India
Gregor Kasieczka
Gregor Kasieczka
Universität Hamburg
Particle PhysicsMachine LearningAnomaly Detection
D
Daniel Kosti'c
Institute of Philosophy, University of Leiden, NL
Michael Kramer
Michael Kramer
RWTH Aachen University, Germany
T
Tobias Golling
University of Geneva, Switzerland
L
Luis G. Lopez
Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, LMU Munich, Germany
J
Jesus Marco
Institute of Physics of Cantabria (IFCA), CSIC-UC, Spain
S
Sydney Otten
Radboud University, NL, Ippen Digital, Germany
Pawel Pawlowski
Pawel Pawlowski
Ghent University
Philosophical logicnon-deterministic semanticsmodal logics
P
Pietro Vischia
Universidad de Oviedo and ICTEA, Spain
E
Erik Weber
CLPS - Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, UGent, BE
Christoph Weniger
Christoph Weniger
Associate Professor of Physics, University of Amsterdam
dark matterastroparticle physicsmachine learning