When do modal definability and preservation theorems transfer to the finite?

📅 2026-03-12
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the long-standing open question of whether classical modal definability and preservation theorems hold in the finite, a setting where many first-order transfer results fail. By systematically investigating the validity of key semantic characterizations in modal logic—such as bisimulation safety and the Goldblatt–Thomason theorem—within finite structures, the paper combines model-theoretic techniques, bisimulation methods, and frame-algebraic analysis to establish, for the first time, that the bisimulation safety theorem remains valid in the finite. It further demonstrates that certain first-order preservation theorems do not carry over to this restricted domain, thereby advancing the theory of modal correspondence in finite models.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We study which classic modal definability and preservation results survive when attention is restricted to finite structures, where many first-order transfer theorems are known to break down. Several semantic characterizations for modal formula classes survive the passage to the finite, while a number of first-order preservation theorems for basic frame operations fail. Our main positive result is that the Bisimulation Safety Theorem does transfer to finite structures. We also discuss computability aspects, and analogues in the finite for the Goldblatt-Thomason theorem and for modal correspondence theory.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

modal definability
preservation theorems
finite structures
Bisimulation Safety Theorem
Goldblatt-Thomason theorem
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

modal definability
preservation theorems
finite structures
bisimulation safety
Goldblatt-Thomason theorem
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
J
Johan van Benthem
ILLC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; The Tsinghua-UvA JRC for Logic, Department of Philosophy, Tsinghua University, China; Department of Philosophy, Stanford University, USA
Balder ten Cate
Balder ten Cate
Associate Professor
Computer ScienceLogicDatabasesMachine Learning
X
Xi Yang
ILLC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; The Tsinghua-UvA JRC for Logic, Department of Philosophy, Tsinghua University, China