ConvScale: Conversational Interviews for Scale-Aligned Measurement

πŸ“… 2026-03-12
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of integrating qualitative, interview-based assessments into quantitative psychometric evaluation while preserving scale structural validity. The authors propose ConvScale, a novel method that seamlessly embeds structured psychological scales into naturalistic conversational interviews. Leveraging an AI-driven dialogue system, ConvScale guides participants through contextually rich interactions and employs natural language processing to map utterances to specific scale items, which are then aggregated into construct-level quantitative scores. This approach enables quantitative analysis without sacrificing contextual depth, thereby expanding the applicability of interviews in psychometrics. In an experiment with 18 participants, item- and construct-level scores generated by ConvScale showed strong agreement with self-reports and demonstrated moderate internal consistency. Although structural validity requires further refinement, the findings substantiate ConvScale’s feasibility as an innovative tool for quantitative psychological assessment.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Conversational interviews are commonly used to complement structured surveys by eliciting rich and contextualized responses, which are typically analyzed qualitatively. However, their potential contribution to quantitative measurement remains underexplored. In this paper, we introduce ConvScale, an AI-supported approach that transforms psychometric scales into natural conversational interviews while preserving the original measurement structure. Based on interview data, ConvScale predicts item-level scores and aggregates them to derive scale-based assessments. In a within-subjects study with 18 participants, our results show that ConvScale-derived scores align closely with participants' self-report scores at both the item and construct levels, while maintaining moderate internal reliability; however, the structural validity was inadequate. In light of this, we discussed the potential of supporting quantitative measurement through interviews and proposed implications for future designs.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

conversational interviews
quantitative measurement
psychometric scales
scale-aligned measurement
item-level scoring
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

ConvScale
conversational interviews
psychometric scales
AI-supported measurement
quantitative assessment
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.