Inverse Neural Operator for ODE Parameter Optimization

📅 2026-03-12
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge of recovering unknown parameters of implicit ordinary differential equations (ODEs) from sparse, partially observed data by proposing a two-stage framework termed INO. First, a conditional Fourier Neural Operator with cross-attention (C-FNO) reconstructs complete system trajectories. Subsequently, an Amortized Drift Model (ADM) directly guides an initial parameter guess toward the true values in parameter space, circumventing backpropagation through surrogate models. The approach incorporates spectral regularization to suppress high-frequency artifacts and effectively mitigates Jacobian instability during gradient-based inversion in stiff systems. Evaluated on the POLLU (25-parameter) and GRN (40-parameter) benchmarks, INO significantly outperforms existing methods, achieving inference in only 0.23 seconds—487 times faster than iterative gradient descent.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We propose the Inverse Neural Operator (INO), a two-stage framework for recovering hidden ODE parameters from sparse, partial observations. In Stage 1, a Conditional Fourier Neural Operator (C-FNO) with cross-attention learns a differentiable surrogate that reconstructs full ODE trajectories from arbitrary sparse inputs, suppressing high-frequency artifacts via spectral regularization. In Stage 2, an Amortized Drifting Model (ADM) learns a kernel-weighted velocity field in parameter space, transporting random parameter initializations toward the ground truth without backpropagating through the surrogate, avoiding the Jacobian instabilities that afflict gradient-based inversion in stiff regimes. Experiments on a real-world stiff atmospheric chemistry benchmark (POLLU, 25 parameters) and a synthetic Gene Regulatory Network (GRN, 40 parameters) show that INO outperforms gradient-based and amortized baselines in parameter recovery accuracy while requiring only 0.23s inference time, a 487x speedup over iterative gradient descent.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

ODE parameter recovery
sparse observations
inverse problem
parameter estimation
hidden dynamics
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Inverse Neural Operator
Conditional Fourier Neural Operator
Amortized Drifting Model
ODE parameter recovery
spectral regularization
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Zhi-Song Liu
Zhi-Song Liu
Associate professor, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT
machine learningpattern recognitionimage processing
W
Wenqing Peng
Atmospheric Modelling Center Lahti (AMC-Lahti), Finland; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
H
Helmi Toropainen
Atmospheric Modelling Center Lahti (AMC-Lahti), Finland; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
A
Ammar Kheder
Department of Computational Engineering, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology, Lahti, Finland; Atmospheric Modelling Center Lahti (AMC-Lahti), Finland; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Andreas Rupp
Andreas Rupp
Saarland University
numerical analysisevolving porous mediadiscontinuous Galerkin
Holger Fröning
Holger Fröning
Professor a Heidelberg University
Resource-efficient machine learningneural networksGPUHPCFPGA
Xiaojie Lin
Xiaojie Lin
University of Technology Sydney
Machine LearningCybersecurity and PrivacyGraph TheoryLLM
M
Michael Boy
Department of Computational Engineering, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology, Lahti, Finland; Atmospheric Modelling Center Lahti (AMC-Lahti), Finland; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland