Towards Trustworthy Selective Generation: Reliability-Guided Diffusion for Ultra-Low-Field to High-Field MRI Synthesis

πŸ“… 2026-03-11
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge of anatomical inconsistencies and structural blurring in synthetic high-field MRI images generated from low-field inputs using existing diffusion models, which undermine clinical reliability. To mitigate this issue, the authors propose ReDiff, a reliability-aware diffusion framework that integrates reliability-guided sampling with an uncertainty-driven multi-candidate selection mechanism. This approach dynamically balances structural fidelity and anatomical plausibility during image generation. Comprehensive experiments on multi-center MRI datasets demonstrate that ReDiff substantially reduces artifacts and outperforms state-of-the-art methods, yielding synthetic images with significantly enhanced clinical credibility.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Low-field to high-field MRI synthesis has emerged as a cost-effective strategy to enhance image quality under hardware and acquisition constraints, particularly in scenarios where access to high-field scanners is limited or impractical. Despite recent progress in diffusion models, diffusion-based approaches often struggle to balance fine-detail recovery and structural fidelity. In particular, the uncontrolled generation of high-resolution details in structurally ambiguous regions may introduce anatomically inconsistent patterns, such as spurious edges or artificial texture variations. These artifacts can bias downstream quantitative analysis. For example, they may cause inaccurate tissue boundary delineation or erroneous volumetric estimation, ultimately reducing clinical trust in synthesized images. These limitations highlight the need for generative models that are not only visually accurate but also spatially reliable and anatomically consistent. To address this issue, we propose a reliability-aware diffusion framework (ReDiff) that improves synthesis robustness at both the sampling and post-generation stages. Specifically, we introduce a reliability-guided sampling strategy to suppress unreliable responses during the denoising process. We further develop an uncertainty-aware multi-candidate selection scheme to enhance the reliability of the final prediction. Experiments on multi-center MRI datasets demonstrate improved structural fidelity and reduced artifacts compared with state-of-the-art methods.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

MRI synthesis
structural fidelity
anatomical consistency
generative artifacts
diffusion models
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

reliability-guided diffusion
ultra-low-field MRI synthesis
structural fidelity
uncertainty-aware selection
anatomical consistency
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Zhenxuan Zhang
Zhenxuan Zhang
Georgia Institute of Technology
P
Peiyuan Jing
Department of Bioengineering and Imperial-X, Imperial College London, London, UK
R
Ruicheng Yuan
Department of Bioengineering and Imperial-X, Imperial College London, London, UK
L
Liwei Hu
Department of Bioengineering and Imperial-X, Imperial College London, London, UK
Anbang Wang
Anbang Wang
Taiyuan University of Technology
nonlinear laser dynamicsbroadband chaos generationchaos OTDR
Fanwen Wang
Fanwen Wang
Imperial College London
Medical imagingMRI reconstructionImage registration
Yinzhe Wu
Yinzhe Wu
Imperial College London
K
Kh Tohidul Islam
Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Zhaolin Chen
Zhaolin Chen
Associate Professor in Medical Imaging, Monash University
Magnetic Resonance ImagingPositron Emission TomographyPET/MRUltra low field MRI
Z
Zi Wang
Department of Bioengineering and Imperial-X, Imperial College London, London, UK
P
Peter Lally
Department of Bioengineering and Imperial-X, Imperial College London, London, UK
G
Guang Yang
Department of Bioengineering and Imperial-X, Imperial College London, London, UK; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.; Cardiovascular Research Centre, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP, U.K.; School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, U.K.