On the Robustness of Langevin Dynamics to Score Function Error

πŸ“… 2026-03-11
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This study investigates the robustness of Langevin dynamics under estimation errors in the score function. Despite the fact that the L^p error of the estimated score can be made arbitrarily small, we provide the first rigorous proof that, in high-dimensional settings, the distribution generated by Langevin dynamics may still deviate significantly from the target distribution in total variation distanceβ€”a discrepancy that cannot be eliminated within polynomial time. By integrating tools from probability theory, high-dimensional statistics, and L^p error analysis, our work uncovers the intrinsic sensitivity of Langevin-based sampling to score estimation inaccuracies, thereby challenging its practical reliability and offering theoretical justification for the empirical superiority of diffusion models over Langevin methods.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
We consider the robustness of score-based generative modeling to errors in the estimate of the score function. In particular, we show that Langevin dynamics is not robust to the L^2 errors (more generally L^p errors) in the estimate of the score function. It is well-established that with small L^2 errors in the estimate of the score function, diffusion models can sample faithfully from the target distribution under fairly mild regularity assumptions in a polynomial time horizon. In contrast, our work shows that even for simple distributions in high dimensions, Langevin dynamics run for any polynomial time horizon will produce a distribution far from the target distribution in Total Variation (TV) distance, even when the L^2 error (more generally L^p) of the estimate of the score function is arbitrarily small. Considering such an error in the estimate of the score function is unavoidable in practice when learning the score function from data, our results provide further justification for diffusion models over Langevin dynamics and serve to caution against the use of Langevin dynamics with estimated scores.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Langevin dynamics
score function error
robustness
generative modeling
Total Variation distance
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Langevin dynamics
score-based generative modeling
robustness
L^p error
Total Variation distance
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
D
Daniel Yiming Cao
Cornell University, Ithaca, USA
A
August Y. Chen
Cornell University, Ithaca, USA
Karthik Sridharan
Karthik Sridharan
Cornell University, University of Pennsylvania, Toyota Technological Institute
Learning TheoryMachine LearningOptimizationReinforcement Learning
Y
Yuchen Wu
Cornell University, Ithaca, USA