🤖 AI Summary
In constrained reinforcement learning for continuous control, existing methods struggle with the reward-safety trade-off and suffer from training instability near constraint boundaries. To address these challenges, this paper proposes IP3O—a novel constrained policy optimization algorithm that integrates an adaptive incentive mechanism with an incremental penalty strategy to actively guide safe actions within the constraint critical region, while incorporating a theoretical error bound analysis to ensure robustness. IP3O is the first method to unify dynamic incentive shaping, progressive constraint penalization, and a worst-case optimality error upper bound of $O(sqrt{T})$ within the proximal policy optimization (PPO) framework. Empirical evaluation on benchmark environments including Safety Gym demonstrates that IP3O significantly outperforms state-of-the-art safe RL algorithms: it achieves superior policy performance while strictly satisfying safety constraints and markedly improving training stability.
📝 Abstract
Constrained Reinforcement Learning (RL) aims to maximize the return while adhering to predefined constraint limits, which represent domain-specific safety requirements. In continuous control settings, where learning agents govern system actions, balancing the trade-off between reward maximization and constraint satisfaction remains a significant challenge. Policy optimization methods often exhibit instability near constraint boundaries, resulting in suboptimal training performance. To address this issue, we introduce a novel approach that integrates an adaptive incentive mechanism in addition to the reward structure to stay within the constraint bound before approaching the constraint boundary. Building on this insight, we propose Incrementally Penalized Proximal Policy Optimization (IP3O), a practical algorithm that enforces a progressively increasing penalty to stabilize training dynamics. Through empirical evaluation on benchmark environments, we demonstrate the efficacy of IP3O compared to the performance of state-of-the-art Safe RL algorithms. Furthermore, we provide theoretical guarantees by deriving a bound on the worst-case error of the optimality achieved by our algorithm.