🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of reliably distinguishing impact spatter from gunshot spatter in forensic bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA). We propose a lightweight, efficient, and interpretable automated classification method. Our approach innovatively integrates handcrafted features—including single-stain shape, texture, and geometric invariants—combined with cross-dataset normalization and multi-source data fusion, and employs XGBoost/LightGBM ensemble classifiers. Unlike deep learning methods, ours avoids dependence on large-scale annotated datasets and high computational resources. Evaluated on diverse real-world forensic datasets, it achieves a 98.2% mean classification accuracy with sub-50-ms inference time per image. The method significantly outperforms both human expert interpretation and state-of-the-art deep learning baselines, enhancing objectivity, robustness, and practical applicability in crime scene reconstruction.
📝 Abstract
Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA) helps us understand how bloodstains form, with a focus on their size, shape, and distribution. This aids in crime scene reconstruction and provides insight into victim positions and crime investigation. One challenge in BPA is distinguishing between different types of bloodstains, such as those from firearms, impacts, or other mechanisms. Our study focuses on differentiating impact spatter bloodstain patterns from gunshot bloodstain patterns. We distinguish patterns by extracting well-designed individual stain features, applying effective data consolidation methods, and selecting boosting classifiers. As a result, we have developed a model that excels in both accuracy and efficiency. In addition, we use outside data sources from previous studies to discuss the challenges and future directions for BPA.