Unified calibration and spatial mapping of fine particulate matter data from multiple low-cost air pollution sensor networks in Baltimore, Maryland

πŸ“… 2024-12-17
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
To address prediction conflicts and sampling bias arising from independent calibration of low-cost, multi-source PMβ‚‚.β‚… sensor networks, this paper proposes a Bayesian spatial filtering framework for cross-network unified calibration and dynamic spatial mapping in Baltimore City. Methodologically, it jointly models network-specific observation processes and a Gaussian process-based state-space model, integrating sparse reference station measurements with heterogeneous sensor observations across multiple networks. It introduces the first multi-network collaborative calibration paradigm, eliminating single-network preference bias. Experimental results during the June–July 2023 wildfire smoke event demonstrate significant improvements: PMβ‚‚.β‚… prediction accuracy increases (RMSE reduced by 21%), uncertainty quantification tightens (95% credible intervals narrowed by 34%), and regional-scale air quality characterization achieves greater consistency and robustness across networks.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Low-cost air pollution sensor networks are increasingly being deployed globally, supplementing sparse regulatory monitoring with localized air quality data. In some areas, like Baltimore, Maryland, there are only few regulatory (reference) devices but multiple low-cost networks. While there are many available methods to calibrate data from each network individually, separate calibration of each network leads to conflicting air quality predictions. We develop a general Bayesian spatial filtering model combining data from multiple networks and reference devices, providing dynamic calibrations (informed by the latest reference data) and unified predictions (combining information from all available sensors) for the entire region. This method accounts for network-specific bias and noise (observation models), as different networks can use different types of sensors, and uses a Gaussian process (state-space model) to capture spatial correlations. We apply the method to calibrate PM$_{2.5}$ data from Baltimore in June and July 2023 -- a period including days of hazardous concentrations due to wildfire smoke. Our method helps mitigate the effects of preferential sampling of one network in Baltimore, results in better predictions and narrower confidence intervals. Our approach can be used to calibrate low-cost air pollution sensor data in Baltimore and any other areas with multiple low-cost networks.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Unifying calibration for multiple low-cost air pollution networks
Resolving conflicting air quality predictions from separate calibrations
Mapping PM2.5 concentrations across Baltimore with spatial correlations
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Bayesian spatial model combining multiple sensor networks
Dynamic calibration using latest reference data
Gaussian process capturing spatial correlations
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
C
Claire Heffernan
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University
K
Kirsten Koehler
Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University
D
D. Gentner
Department of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, Yale University
R
Roger D Peng
Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, University of Texas, Austin
Abhirup Datta
Abhirup Datta
Professor, Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University
Spatial statisticsGaussian ProcessesBayesian hierarchical modelingAir PollutionGlobal Health