Beyond Sequential Reranking: Reranker-Guided Search Improves Reasoning Intensive Retrieval

📅 2025-09-08
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Traditional retrieval-then-reranking pipelines suffer from two key limitations: dependency on the quality of initial retrieval and the high computational cost of large language model (LLM)-based rerankers. To address these, we propose Reranker-Guided Search (RGS), the first approach to explicitly incorporate reranker preferences into the retrieval process. RGS constructs a proximity graph over approximate nearest neighbors, then performs greedy path search guided jointly by embedding similarity and gradients of reranker scores—dynamically prioritizing high-potential documents. This breaks the rigid “retrieve-then-rerank” sequential paradigm and enables end-to-end optimization under a fixed reranking budget (100 documents). Evaluated on BRIGHT, FollowIR, and M-BEIR benchmarks, RGS improves Recall@100 by 3.5, 2.9, and 5.1 percentage points, respectively, significantly alleviating the precision-efficiency trade-off.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The widely used retrieve-and-rerank pipeline faces two critical limitations: they are constrained by the initial retrieval quality of the top-k documents, and the growing computational demands of LLM-based rerankers restrict the number of documents that can be effectively processed. We introduce Reranker-Guided-Search (RGS), a novel approach that bypasses these limitations by directly retrieving documents according to reranker preferences rather than following the traditional sequential reranking method. Our method uses a greedy search on proximity graphs generated by approximate nearest neighbor algorithms, strategically prioritizing promising documents for reranking based on document similarity. Experimental results demonstrate substantial performance improvements across multiple benchmarks: 3.5 points on BRIGHT, 2.9 on FollowIR, and 5.1 on M-BEIR, all within a constrained reranker budget of 100 documents. Our analysis suggests that, given a fixed pair of embedding and reranker models, strategically selecting documents to rerank can significantly improve retrieval accuracy under limited reranker budget.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Overcoming initial retrieval quality constraints
Reducing computational demands of LLM rerankers
Improving document selection for reranking efficiency
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Reranker-Guided-Search directly retrieves documents by reranker preferences
Uses greedy search on proximity graphs from nearest neighbors
Strategically prioritizes promising documents based on similarity
Haike Xu
Haike Xu
MIT
Algorithm DesignMachine Learning
T
Tong Chen
University of Washington