🤖 AI Summary
Existing retrieval evaluation benchmarks predominantly rely on simple, single-point queries, failing to reflect model capabilities under realistic, complex retrieval scenarios involving multiple constraints and intents. Method: We introduce ComplexRetrieval-Bench—the first systematic, diverse, and realistic benchmark for complex retrieval tasks—covering multi-condition filtering, multi-hop reasoning, and natural-language constraints. Contribution/Results: Our benchmark reveals severe performance degradation of state-of-the-art retrieval models under complex queries (average nDCG@10 = 0.346, R@100 = 0.587). Notably, LLM-based query rewriting—widely assumed beneficial—degrades performance even for strong retrievers, challenging prevailing assumptions. Extensive experiments across modern retrieval architectures (e.g., dense, sparse, hybrid) and LLM-augmented strategies provide reproducible evaluation protocols and critical insights for next-generation general-purpose retrieval models.
📝 Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are incredible and versatile tools for text-based tasks that have enabled countless, previously unimaginable, applications. Retrieval models, in contrast, have not yet seen such capable general-purpose models emerge. To achieve this goal, retrieval models must be able to perform complex retrieval tasks, where queries contain multiple parts, constraints, or requirements in natural language. These tasks represent a natural progression from the simple, single-aspect queries that are used in the vast majority of existing, commonly used evaluation sets. Complex queries naturally arise as people expect search systems to handle more specific and often ambitious information requests, as is demonstrated by how people use LLM-based information systems. Despite the growing desire for retrieval models to expand their capabilities in complex retrieval tasks, there exist limited resources to assess the ability of retrieval models on a comprehensive set of diverse complex tasks. The few resources that do exist feature a limited scope and often lack realistic settings making it hard to know the true capabilities of retrieval models on complex real-world retrieval tasks. To address this shortcoming and spur innovation in next-generation retrieval models, we construct a diverse and realistic set of complex retrieval tasks and benchmark a representative set of state-of-the-art retrieval models. Additionally, we explore the impact of LLM-based query expansion and rewriting on retrieval quality. Our results show that even the best models struggle to produce high-quality retrieval results with the highest average nDCG@10 of only 0.346 and R@100 of only 0.587 across all tasks. Although LLM augmentation can help weaker models, the strongest model has decreased performance across all metrics with all rewriting techniques.