CONSENT: A Negotiation Framework for Leveraging User Flexibility in Vehicle-to-Building Charging under Uncertainty

๐Ÿ“… 2026-01-04
๐Ÿ›๏ธ arXiv.org
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This study addresses the conflict between high energy costs for building operators and charging convenience for electric vehicle (EV) users in vehicle-to-building (V2B) scenarios. To resolve this tension, the work proposes the first incentive mechanism framework based on strategic negotiation, which encourages EV users to offer modest flexibility in either departure time or desired state of charge, thereby achieving mutual benefits. The framework innovatively integrates mechanism design theory with optimization algorithms to guarantee voluntary participation, strategy-proofness, and budget balance. An incentive-compatible negotiation protocol is developed using insights from user surveys and real-world operational data. Experimental results demonstrate that, compared to non-negotiated smart charging strategies, the proposed approach reduces operatorsโ€™ electricity costs by over 3.5% and lowers usersโ€™ charging expenses by 22% relative to retail electricity rates.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
The growth of Electric Vehicles (EVs) creates a conflict in vehicle-to-building (V2B) settings between building operators, who face high energy costs from uncoordinated charging, and drivers, who prioritize convenience and a full charge. To resolve this, we propose a negotiation-based framework that, by design, guarantees voluntary participation, strategy-proofness, and budget feasibility. It transforms EV charging into a strategic resource by offering drivers a range of incentive-backed options for modest flexibility in their departure time or requested state of charge (SoC). Our framework is calibrated with user survey data and validated using real operational data from a commercial building and an EV manufacturer. Simulations show that our negotiation protocol creates a mutually beneficial outcome: lowering the building operator's costs by over 3.5\% compared to an optimized, non-negotiating smart charging policy, while simultaneously reducing user charging expenses by 22\% below the utility's retail energy rate. By aligning operator and EV user objectives, our framework provides a strategic bridge between energy and mobility systems, transforming EV charging from a source of operational friction into a platform for collaboration and shared savings.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Vehicle-to-Building
Electric Vehicles
charging coordination
user flexibility
energy cost
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

negotiation framework
vehicle-to-building (V2B)
user flexibility
strategy-proofness
incentive-based charging
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
R
Rishav Sen
Vanderbilt University, USA
F
Fangqi Liu
Vanderbilt University, USA
J
J. P. Talusan
Vanderbilt University, USA
A
Ava Pettet
Nissan Advanced Technology Center - Silicon Valley, USA
Y
Yoshinori Suzue
Nissan Advanced Technology Center - Silicon Valley, USA
M
Mark Bailey
Nissan Advanced Technology Center - Silicon Valley, USA
Ayan Mukhopadhyay
Ayan Mukhopadhyay
Senior Research Scientist, Vanderbilt University
Artificial IntelligenceDecision Making under UncertaintyRobust Machine LearningDeep Learning
Abhishek Dubey
Abhishek Dubey
Vanderbilt University
AI Decision ProceduresCyber Physical SystemsPublic TransitEnergy Systems