Trustworthy Data-Driven Wildfire Risk Prediction and Understanding in Western Canada

📅 2026-01-04
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Wildfire risk prediction faces significant challenges due to the stochastic nature of ignition and spread processes, as well as complex nonlinear interactions among multiple drivers, which often undermine the reliability and interpretability of data-driven models. This work proposes the first trustworthy prediction framework that integrates multi-scale temporal modeling, uncertainty quantification, and SHAP-based interpretability to effectively fuse heterogeneous driving factors and uncover their spatiotemporal influence mechanisms. Evaluated during the 2023–2024 wildfire seasons in western Canada, the model achieves an F1 score of 0.90 and a PR-AUC of 0.98 at low computational cost, revealing key insights such as the dominant role of temperature in overall risk and the pronounced spatial heterogeneity in humidity effects.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
In recent decades, the intensification of wildfire activity in western Canada has resulted in substantial socio-economic and environmental losses. Accurate wildfire risk prediction is hindered by the intrinsic stochasticity of ignition and spread and by nonlinear interactions among fuel conditions, meteorology, climate variability, topography, and human activities, challenging the reliability and interpretability of purely data-driven models. We propose a trustworthy data-driven wildfire risk prediction framework based on long-sequence, multi-scale temporal modeling, which integrates heterogeneous drivers while explicitly quantifying predictive uncertainty and enabling process-level interpretation. Evaluated over western Canada during the record-breaking 2023 and 2024 fire seasons, the proposed model outperforms existing time-series approaches, achieving an F1 score of 0.90 and a PR-AUC of 0.98 with low computational cost. Uncertainty-aware analysis reveals structured spatial and seasonal patterns in predictive confidence, highlighting increased uncertainty associated with ambiguous predictions and spatiotemporal decision boundaries. SHAP-based interpretation provides mechanistic understanding of wildfire controls, showing that temperature-related drivers dominate wildfire risk in both years, while moisture-related constraints play a stronger role in shaping spatial and land-cover-specific contrasts in 2024 compared to the widespread hot and dry conditions of 2023. Data and code are available at https://github.com/SynUW/mmFire.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

wildfire risk prediction
data-driven models
predictive uncertainty
model interpretability
nonlinear interactions
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

trustworthy AI
wildfire risk prediction
uncertainty quantification
multi-scale temporal modeling
SHAP interpretability
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Zhengsen Xu
Zhengsen Xu
University of Calgary
Deep LearningRemote SensingNatural DisasterWildfire
Lanying Wang
Lanying Wang
PhD Candidate, University of Waterloo
Remote sensing
Sibo Cheng
Sibo Cheng
Junior Professor, CEREA,ENPC, Institut Polytechnique de Paris
AI4scienceData assimilationMachine learningModel reductionscientific computing
X
Xue Rui
School of Emergency Management, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, 219 Ningliu Road, Nanjing, 210044, China
K
K. Gao
Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, N2L3G1, Ontario, Canada
Yimin Zhu
Yimin Zhu
University of Calgary,Geomatics Engineering department
hyperspectral imageunmixingdeep learningdiffusion modelwildfire
M
Mabel Heffring
Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, T2N1N4, Alberta, Canada
Zack Dewis
Zack Dewis
M.Sc, University of Calgary
Saeid Taleghanidoozdoozan
Saeid Taleghanidoozdoozan
Postdoctoral Associate, Department of Geomatics Engineering , University of Calgary, Canada
Machine LearningRemote Sensing
M
Megan Greenwood
Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, T2N1N4, Alberta, Canada
M
Motasem Alkayid
Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, T2N1N4, Alberta, Canada; Department of Geography, Faculty of Arts, The University of Jordan, Queen Rania Street, Amman, 11942, Jordan
Q
Quinn Ledingham
Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, T2N1N4, Alberta, Canada
Hongjie He
Hongjie He
University of Waterloo
Remote sensingGeospatial AIimage classification
Jonathan Li
Jonathan Li
Geomatics & Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo; Fellow of RSC/CAE/EIC/IEEE
GeomaticsMobile MappingLaser Scanning3D VisionRemote Sensing
Lincoln Linlin Xu
Lincoln Linlin Xu
Assistant Professor, Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary
AI & machine learningHyperspectral LiDAR SAREnvironmental monitoringGeospatial data science