Inferring Network Evolutionary History via Structure-State Coupled Learning

📅 2026-01-05
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing methods for inferring the evolutionary history of networks rely solely on topological structure from a single temporal snapshot, which provides limited information and is highly susceptible to noise. This work proposes the first framework that incorporates steady-state dynamics—the convergent states of nodes under dynamical processes—as an independent and complementary signal to topology. We introduce a Coupled Structure–State learning framework (CS²) that jointly models the interaction between network topology and steady-state dynamics to refine the temporal ordering of edges. Evaluated on six real-world temporal networks, our approach improves edge-ordering accuracy by 4.0% and Spearman-ρ consistency by 7.7% on average, while more faithfully reconstructing macroscopic evolutionary patterns such as clustering dynamics, degree heterogeneity, and hub emergence. Notably, even when using only steady-state information, the method remains competitive in scenarios where topological data is unreliable.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Inferring a network's evolutionary history from a single final snapshot with limited temporal annotations is fundamental yet challenging. Existing approaches predominantly rely on topology alone, which often provides insufficient and noisy cues. This paper leverages network steady-state dynamics -- converged node states under a given dynamical process -- as an additional and widely accessible observation for network evolution history inference. We propose CS$^2$, which explicitly models structure-state coupling to capture how topology modulates steady states and how the two signals jointly improve edge discrimination for formation-order recovery. Experiments on six real temporal networks, evaluated under multiple dynamical processes, show that CS$^2$ consistently outperforms strong baselines, improving pairwise edge precedence accuracy by 4.0% on average and global ordering consistency (Spearman-$\rho$) by 7.7% on average. CS$^2$ also more faithfully recovers macroscopic evolution trajectories such as clustering formation, degree heterogeneity, and hub growth. Moreover, a steady-state-only variant remains competitive when reliable topology is limited, highlighting steady states as an independent signal for evolution inference.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

network evolution
evolutionary history inference
steady-state dynamics
temporal networks
structure-state coupling
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

structure-state coupling
network evolution inference
steady-state dynamics
edge formation ordering
temporal network reconstruction
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.