FMVP: Masked Flow Matching for Adversarial Video Purification

📅 2026-01-05
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the limitations of existing diffusion-based video adversarial purification methods, which suffer from low sampling efficiency and distorted trajectories, hindering effective recovery of perturbed content. The authors propose a Masked Flow Matching (MFM) mechanism that disrupts global adversarial structures via physical masking and leverages Conditional Flow Matching (CFM) combined with inpainting objectives to reconstruct clean video dynamics. Additionally, a Frequency-Gated Loss (FGL) is introduced to disentangle semantic content from adversarial noise. Incorporating attack-awareness and a generalizable training paradigm, the method achieves robust accuracies of 87% and 89% against PGD and CW attacks on UCF-101 and HMDB-51, respectively, demonstrates strong performance against the adaptive DiffHammer attack, and attains a 98% zero-shot detection accuracy for PGD perturbations.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Video recognition models remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, while existing diffusion-based purification methods suffer from inefficient sampling and curved trajectories. Directly regressing clean videos from adversarial inputs often fails to recover faithful content due to the subtle nature of perturbations; this necessitates physically shattering the adversarial structure. Therefore, we propose Flow Matching for Adversarial Video Purification FMVP. FMVP physically shatters global adversarial structures via a masking strategy and reconstructs clean video dynamics using Conditional Flow Matching (CFM) with an inpainting objective. To further decouple semantic content from adversarial noise, we design a Frequency-Gated Loss (FGL) that explicitly suppresses high-frequency adversarial residuals while preserving low-frequency fidelity. We design Attack-Aware and Generalist training paradigms to handle known and unknown threats, respectively. Extensive experiments on UCF-101 and HMDB-51 demonstrate that FMVP outperforms state-of-the-art methods (DiffPure, Defense Patterns (DP), Temporal Shuffling (TS) and FlowPure), achieving robust accuracy exceeding 87% against PGD and 89% against CW attacks. Furthermore, FMVP demonstrates superior robustness against adaptive attacks (DiffHammer) and functions as a zero-shot adversarial detector, attaining AUC-ROC scores of 0.98 for PGD and 0.79 for highly imperceptible CW attacks.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

adversarial video purification
video recognition robustness
adversarial attacks
diffusion-based purification
adversarial structure
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Conditional Flow Matching
Adversarial Video Purification
Frequency-Gated Loss
Masking Strategy
Zero-shot Adversarial Detection
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
D
Duoxun Tang
Tsinghua University, China
X
Xueyi Zhang
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China
C
Chak Hin Wang
University of New South Wales, Australia
Xi Xiao
Xi Xiao
Oak Ridge National Laboratory | University of Alabama at Birmingham
LLM / MLLM EfficiencyImage / Video GenerationImage / Video Understanding
D
Dasen Dai
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
X
Xinhang Jiang
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China
Wentao Shi
Wentao Shi
University of Science and Technology of China
RecommendationLLM Agent
R
Rui Li
Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, China
Qing Li
Qing Li
Pengcheng Laboratory
Indoor localizationdepth predictioncamera relocalizationneural reonstruction