Error-Building Decoding of Linear Block Codes

📅 2026-01-05
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the high computational complexity of soft-decision maximum-likelihood decoding, which typically relies on preconstructed structures such as trellises or error-pattern lists. The authors propose an efficient decoding framework that requires only the parity-check matrix, introducing a novel recursive error-building-block mechanism grounded in algebraic properties. This approach directly approximates the most likely error pattern through local optimal search without any preprocessing overhead. By integrating offline and online exclusion strategies tailored specifically for extended Hamming codes, the method substantially reduces computational cost. Experimental results demonstrate that, at a frame error rate of 10⁻³, the proposed decoder achieves approximately one order of magnitude reduction in average floating-point operations compared to the minimal-edge trellis Viterbi algorithm for extended Hamming codes of lengths 64, 128, and 256, with no loss in decoding performance.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
This paper proposes a novel maximum-likelihood (ML) soft-decision decoding framework for linear block codes, termed error-building decoding (EBD). The complete decoding process can be performed using only the parity-check matrix, without requiring any other pre-constructed information (such as trellis diagrams or error-pattern lists), and it can also be customized by exploiting the algebraic properties of the code. We formally define error-building blocks, and derive a recursive theorem that allows efficient construction of larger locally optimal blocks from smaller ones, thereby effectively searching for the block associated with the most likely error pattern. The EBD framework is further optimized for extended Hamming codes as an example, through offline and online exclusion mechanisms, leading to a substantial complexity reduction without loss of ML performance. Complexity analysis shows that, for extended Hamming codes of lengths 64, 128, and 256, the fully optimized EBD requires approximately an order of magnitude fewer floating-point operations on average than minimum-edge trellis Viterbi decoding at a frame error rate of $10^{-3}$.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

maximum-likelihood decoding
linear block codes
soft-decision decoding
parity-check matrix
decoding complexity
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

error-building decoding
maximum-likelihood decoding
linear block codes
parity-check matrix
complexity reduction
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
G
Guoda Qiu
State Key Laboratory of Opto-Electronic Information Acquisition and Protection Technology, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
Ling Liu
Ling Liu
Georgia Institute of Technology
Distributed Computing SystemsDatabase SystemsPrivacy-Security-TrustCloud ComputingBig Data Systems/Data Analytics
Y
Yuejun Wei
School of Computer and Information Engineering, Shanghai Polytechnic University, Shanghai 201209, China
L
Liping Li
State Key Laboratory of Opto-Electronic Information Acquisition and Protection Technology, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China